ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2014
Architectural design of the pelvic floor is consistent with muscle functional subspecialization.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sexual Dimorphism in the Architectural Design of Rat and Human Pelvic Floor Muscles.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2024Article
- A unified pelvic floor conceptual model for studying morphological changes with prolapse, age, and parity.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024Review
- Using Myofascial Therapy to Improve Psychological Outcomes, Quality of Life, and Sexual Function in Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain-A Case Series.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparative effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training, mirabegron, and trospium among older women with urgency urinary incontinence and high fall risk: a feasibility randomized clinical study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2024Article
- The variation in shape and thickness of the pelvic floor musculature in males and females: a geometric-morphometric analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2023Article
- Novel Application of Photogrammetry to Quantify Fascicle Orientations of Female Cadaveric Pelvic Floor Muscles.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2021Article
- Impact of vaginal parity and aging on the architectural design of pelvic floor muscles.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2016Article
- High resolution muscle measurements provide insights into equinus contractures in patients with cerebral palsy.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2015Article
- Comparison of pelvic muscle architecture between humans and commonly used laboratory species.International urogynecology journal · 2014Article
- Hip and Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength in Women with and without Urgency and Frequency Predominant Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.Journal of women's health physical therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisSkeletal muscle architecture is the strongest predictor of a muscle's functional capacity. The purpose of this study was to define the architectural properties of the deep muscles of the female pelvic floor (PFMs) to elucidate their structure-function relationships.
methodsPFMs coccygeus (C), iliococcygeus (IC), and pubovisceral (PV) were harvested en bloc from ten fixed human cadavers (mean age 85 years, range 55-102). Fundamental architectural parameters of skeletal muscles [physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA), normalized fiber length, and sarcomere length (L(s))] were determined using validated methods. PCSA predicts muscle-force production, and normalized fiber length is related to muscle excursion. These parameters were compared using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc t tests, as appropriate. Significance was set to α = 0.05.
resultsPFMs were thinner than expected based on data reported from imaging studies and in vivo palpation. Significant differences in fiber length were observed across PFMs: C = 5.29 ± 0.32 cm, IC = 7.55 ± 0.46 cm, PV = 10.45 ± 0.67 cm (p < 0.001). Average L(s) of all PFMs was short relative to the optimal L(s) of 2.7 μm of other human skeletal muscles: C = 2.05 ± 0.02 μm, IC = 2.02 ± 0.02 μm, PC/PR = 2.07 ± 0.01 μm (p = <0.001 compared with 2.7 μm; p = 0.15 between PFMs, power = 0.46). Average PCSA was very small compared with other human muscles, with no significant difference between individual PFMs: C = 0.71 ± 0.06 cm(2), IC = 0.63 ± 0.04 cm(2), PV = 0.59 ± 0.05 cm(2) (p = 0.21, power = 0.27). Overall, C had shortest fibers, making it a good stabilizer. PV demonstrated the longest fibers, suggesting that it functions to produce large excursions.
conclusionsPFM design shows individual muscles demonstrating differential architecture, corresponding to specialized function in the pelvic floor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.