ArticleJournal of human hypertension2014
Central pulse pressure in patients with chronic kidney disease and in renal transplant recipients.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of Pulse Wave Velocity in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3-5 on Long-Term Follow-Up.Pulse (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014Article
- Decline of Renal Function and Progression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Are Independently Determined in Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3-5.Pulse (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and renal transplant recipients (RTR) have increased cardiovascular risk. The value of measuring central pulse pressure (cPP) over brachial pulse pressure (pPP) is not known. Central PP was measured in 597 patients (364 CKD:233 RTR). In multivariate analysis, age and female gender positively correlated with cPP; heart rate and estimated glomerular filtration rate negatively correlated with cPP. Associations for age, heart rate and gender persisted after additional adjustment for pPP and aortic wave reflection. This model accounted for 91% of the variability in cPP, with pPP alone accounting for 74%. Results were similar when both patient groups were analysed separately. A subset of patients with CKD had aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) measured. There were no differences in the univariate correlations between PWV (r=0.368 vs 0.315; P=0.4) or LVMI (r=0.125 vs 0.163; P=0.7); nor in the multivariate models created for PWV (P=0.1) or LVMI (P=0.1) when either cPP or pPP were used. This study demonstrates that in these patients most of the variability in cPP can be explained by pPP. Additionally, cPP does not appear to provide additional information beyond pPP in determining PWV and LVMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.