Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23902825›Full record

Trial reportRadiation oncology (London, England)2013

Electrons for intraoperative radiotherapy in selected breast-cancer patients: late results of the Montpellier phase II trial.

Claire Lemanski, David Azria, Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade, Norbert Ailleres, Aurelie Pastant, Philippe Rouanet, Pascal Fenoglietto, Jean-Bernard Dubois, Marian Gutowski

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02386371 (Feasibility Clinical Trial of Intraoperative Radiotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02386371 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility Clinical Trial of Intraoperative Radiotherapy (IORT) and Second Breast-conserving-surgery After Local Recurrence of Breast Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleRan2014 to 2023Enrolled66ConditionsBreast CarcinomaArmstumorectomy, Intra Operative Radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Present state and issues in IORT Physics.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2017
    Review
  10. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as boost in breast cancer.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2017
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Intraoperative Period and Breast Cancer: Review.The journal of breast health · 2014
    Review
  13. Boost IORT in Breast Cancer: Body of Evidence.International journal of breast cancer · 2014
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claire LemanskiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, I,C,M, - Institut regional du Cancer Montpellier, INSERM U896, Montpellier cedex 5, F-34298, France. David.Azria@icm.unicancer.fr.
David Azria
Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade
Norbert Ailleres
Aurelie Pastant
Philippe Rouanet
Pascal Fenoglietto
Jean-Bernard Dubois
Marian Gutowski
Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Montpellier cancer institute phase II trial started in 2004 and evaluated the feasibility of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) technique given as a sole radiation treatment for patients with an excellent prognostic and very low recurrence risk.

methodsForty-two patients were included between 2004 and 2007. Inclusion criteria were patients ≥ 65 years old, T0-T1, N0, ductal invasive unifocal carcinoma, free-margin > 2 mm. IORT was delivered using dedicated linear accelerator. One fraction of 21 Gy was prescribed and specified at the 90% isodose using electrons. In vivo dosimetry was performed for all patients. Primary end-point was the quality index. Secondary endpoints were quality of life, local recurrences, cosmetic results, specific and overall survival.

resultsAt inclusion, median age was 72 years (range, 66-80). Median tumor diameter was 10 mm. All patients received the total prescribed dose. No acute grade 3 toxicities were observed. Late cosmetic results were good at 5 years despite the poor agreement of accuracy assessment between patients and physicians. Four patients (9.5%) experienced a local failure and underwent salvage mastectomy. The 5 year-disease free survival is 92.7% (range 79.1-97.6). All patients are still alive with a median follow-up of 72 months (range 66-74).

conclusionOur results confirm with a long-term follow-up that exclusive partial breast IORT is feasible for early-breast cancer in selected patients. IORT provides good late cosmetics results and should be considered as a safe and very comfortable "one-step" treatment procedure. Nevertheless, patient assessments are essential for long-term quality results.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastDisease-Free SurvivalElectronsFemaleHumansIntraoperative PeriodKaplan-Meier EstimateRadiotherapyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23902825
PMCPMC3846423
OpenAlexW2143479877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.