Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23902657›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of nutrition2013

Monitoring immune modulation by nutrition in the general population: identifying and substantiating effects on human health.

Ruud Albers, Raphaëlle Bourdet-Sicard, Deborah Braun, Philip C Calder, Udo Herz, Claude Lambert, Irene Lenoir-Wijnkoop, Agnès Méheust, Arthur Ouwehand, Phoukham Phothirath and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of nutrition, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05190432 (A Pilot Study of Dietary Taxifolin/Dihydroquercetin and Ergothioneine and Immune Biomarkers in Healthy Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
39.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05190432 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Study of Dietary Taxifolin/Dihydroquercetin and Ergothioneine and Immune Biomarkers in Healthy Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SouthamptonRan2021 to 2026Enrolled90ConditionsAntioxidative Stress, Cold, Influenza, AgingArmsTaxifolin, Ergothioneine, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Effect of Heat-TreatedNutrients · 2024
    Trial
  5. The effect of 12-week high-doseFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Combination of the ProbioticsFrontiers in immunology · 2021
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 7 countries.

Ruud AlbersUnilever R&D, 3130 AC, Vlaardingen, The Netherlands.
Raphaëlle Bourdet-Sicard
Deborah Braun
Philip C Calder
Udo Herz
Claude Lambert
Irene Lenoir-Wijnkoop
Agnès Méheust
Arthur Ouwehand
Phoukham Phothirath
Tomoyuki Sako
Seppo Salminen
André Siemensma
Henk van Loveren
Ulrich Sack
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRDanone (France) · FRDuPont (Finland) · FIFrieslandCampina (Netherlands) · NLInstitut Mérieux (France) · FRInternational Life Sciences Institute Europe · BELeipzig University · DENational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLNestlé (Switzerland) · CHUnilever (Netherlands) · NLUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of Turku · FIYakult (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal functioning of the immune system is crucial to human health, and nutrition is one of the major exogenous factors modulating different aspects of immune function. Currently, no single marker is available to predict the effect of a dietary intervention on different aspects of immune function. To provide further guidance on the assessment and interpretation of the modulation of immune functions due to nutrition in the general population, International Life Sciences Institute Europe commissioned a group of experts from academia, government and the food industry to prepare a guidance document. A draft of this paper was refined at a workshop involving additional experts. First, the expert group defined criteria to evaluate the usefulness of immune function markers. Over seventy-five markers were scored within the context of three distinct immune system functions: defence against pathogens; avoidance or mitigation of allergy; control of low-grade (metabolic) inflammation. The most useful markers were subsequently classified depending on whether they by themselves signify clinical relevance and/or involvement of immune function. Next, five theoretical scenarios were drafted describing potential changes in the values of markers compared with a relevant reference range. Finally, all elements were combined, providing a framework to aid the design and interpretation of studies assessing the effects of nutrition on immune function. This stepwise approach offers a clear rationale for selecting markers for future trials and provides a framework for the interpretation of outcomes. A similar stepwise approach may also be useful to rationalise the selection and interpretation of markers for other physiological processes critical to the maintenance of health and well-being.

Indexed as

BiomarkersHypersensitivityInfectionsInflammationNutritional Physiological PhenomenaGuidelines as TopicHealth StatusHumansImmune SystemOutcome Assessment, Health CareResearch DesignBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID23902657
PMCPMC3734536
OpenAlexW2169076799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.