Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23902583›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2013

The prevalence of pain at pressure areas and pressure ulcers in hospitalised patients.

Michelle Briggs, Michelle Collinson, Lyn Wilson, Carly Rivers, Elizabeth McGinnis, Carol Dealey, Julia Brown, Susanne Coleman, Nikki Stubbs, Rebecca Stevenson and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
18.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Organisation of health services for preventing and treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Support surfaces for treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Michelle BriggsCentre for Pain Research, Queens Square House, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK. m.i.briggs@leedsmet.ac.uk.
Michelle Collinson
Lyn Wilson
Carly Rivers
Elizabeth McGinnis
Carol Dealey
Julia Brown
Susanne Coleman
Nikki Stubbs
Rebecca Stevenson
E Andrea Nelson
Jane Nixon
University of Leeds · GBLeeds Beckett University · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBPraxis Spinal Cord Institute · CASt. Mary's Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health PDA/01/05/010Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with pressure ulcers (PUs) report that pain is their most distressing symptom, but there are few PU pain prevalence studies. We sought to estimate the prevalence of unattributed pressure area related pain (UPAR pain) which was defined as pain, soreness or discomfort reported by patients, on an "at risk" or PU skin site, reported at a patient level.

methodsWe undertook pain prevalence surveys in 2 large UK teaching hospital NHS Trusts (6 hospitals) and a district general hospital NHS Trust (3 hospitals) during their routine annual PU prevalence audits. The hospitals provide secondary and tertiary care beds in acute and elective surgery, trauma and orthopaedics, burns, medicine, elderly medicine, oncology and rehabilitation. Anonymised individual patient data were recorded by the ward nurse and PU prevalence team. The analysis of this prevalence survey included data summaries; no inferential statistical testing was planned or undertaken. Percentages were calculated using the total number of patients from the relevant population as the denominator (i.e. including all patients with missing data for that variable).

resultsA total of 3,397 patients in 9 acute hospitals were included in routine PU prevalence audits and, of these, 2010 (59.2%) patients participated in the pain prevalence study. UPAR pain prevalence was 16.3% (327/2010). 1769 patients had no PUs and of these 223 patients reported UPAR pain, a prevalence of 12.6%. Of the 241 people with pressure ulcers, 104 patients reported pain, a UPAR pain prevalence of 43.2% (104/241).

conclusionOne in six people in acute hospitals experience UPAR pain on 'at risk' or PU skin sites; one in every 8 people without PUs and, more than 2 out of every five people with PUs. The results provide a clear indication that all patients should be asked if they have pain at pressure areas even when they do not have a PU.

Identifiers

PMID23902583
PMCPMC3765382
OpenAlexW2120817189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.