ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2013
Access to patient-level data from GlaxoSmithKline clinical trials.
Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Benefits and harms of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines: comparison of trial data from clinical study reports with corresponding trial register entries and journal publications.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Updating insights into rosiglitazone and cardiovascular risk through shared data: individual patient and summary level meta-analyses.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2020Pooled it
- Exploring changes over time and characteristics associated with data retrieval across individual participant data meta-analyses: systematic review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2017Pooled it
- A patient-level data meta-analysis of standard-of-care treatments from eight prostate cancer clinical trials.Scientific data · 2016Pooled it
- Opening clinical trial data: are the voluntary data-sharing portals enough?BMC medicine · 2015Pooled it
- Best Practices for Ethical Sharing of Individual-Level Health Research Data From Low- and Middle-Income Settings.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2015Pooled it
- Background rates of disease in Latin American children from a rotavirus vaccine study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2017Trial
- Regulatory Frameworks for Clinical Trial Data Sharing: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Dual versus monotherapy with bronchodilators in GOLD group B COPD patients according to baseline FEVRespiratory research · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Data Sharing After Implementation of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Data Sharing Statement Requirement.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Issues and Challenges Associated with Data-Sharing in LMICs: Perspectives of Researchers in Thailand.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020Article
- Obtaining and managing data sets for individual participant data meta-analysis: scoping review and practical guide.BMC medical research methodology · 2020Article
- Sharing of Clinical Trial Data and Samples: The Cancer Patient Perspective.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Article
- Sharing of clinical trial data and results reporting practices among large pharmaceutical companies: cross sectional descriptive study and pilot of a tool to improve company practices.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2019Article
- Data sharing from pharmaceutical industry sponsored clinical studies: audit of data availability.BMC medicine · 2018Article
- Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the era of individual patient data sharing.International journal of clinical oncology · 2018Article
- Article
- Improving public health by improving clinical trial guidelines and their application.European heart journal · 2017Article
- Comparison of two independent systematic reviews of trials of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2): the Yale Open Data Access Medtronic Project.Systematic reviews · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.