Participant-level data and the new frontier in trial transparency.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

1. Exploring changes over time and characteristics associated with data retrieval across individual participant data meta-analyses: systematic review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2017
   Pooled it
2. Best Practices for Ethical Sharing of Individual-Level Health Research Data From Low- and Middle-Income Settings.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2015
   Pooled it
3. Background rates of disease in Latin American children from a rotavirus vaccine study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2017
   Trial
4. What constitutes equitable data sharing in global health research? A scoping review of the literature on low-income and middle-income country stakeholders' perspectives.BMJ global health · 2023
   Article
5. Data privacy protection in scientific publications: process implementation at a pharmaceutical company.BMC medical ethics · 2022
   Article
6. Practical Considerations and Challenges When Conducting an Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
   Article
7. It is not enough that we require data to be shared; we have to make sharing easy, feasible and accessible too!BMJ global health · 2019
   Article
8. Clinical Trial Participants' Views of the Risks and Benefits of Data Sharing.The New England journal of medicine · 2018
   Article
9. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the era of individual patient data sharing.International journal of clinical oncology · 2018
   Article
10. To share or not to share? Expected pros and cons of data sharing in radiological research.European radiology · 2018
    Article
11. Learning disease relationships from clinical drug trials.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017
    Article
12. Sharing Individual Participant Data (IPD) within the Context of the Trial Reporting System (TRS).PLoS medicine · 2016
    Review
13. Views of Ethical Best Practices in Sharing Individual-Level Data From Medical and Public Health Research: A Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2015
    Article
14. Sharing Public Health Research Data: Toward the Development of Ethical Data-Sharing Practice in Low- and Middle-Income Settings.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2015
    Article
15. Developing Ethical Practices for Public Health Research Data Sharing in South Africa: The Views and Experiences From a Diverse Sample of Research Stakeholders.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2015
    Article
16. Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research.Lancet (London, England) · 2014
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Efficacy of remission-induction regimens for ANCA-associated vasculitis.2013
• Comment on
  Access to patient-level data from GlaxoSmithKline clinical trials.2013

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as