ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013
MGC: a metagenomic gene caller.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-feature fusion for gene prediction and functional peptide identification.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Genomic language models (gLMs) decode bacterial genomes for improved gene prediction and translation initiation site identification.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Functional Metagenomics to Study Antibiotic Resistance.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- The endophytome (plant-associated microbiome): methodological approaches, biological aspects, and biotech applications.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2021Review
- Application of Deep Learning in Plant-Microbiota Association Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- NGS read classification using AI.PloS one · 2021Article
- GPRED-GC: a Gene PREDiction model accounting for 5BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- CNN-MGP: Convolutional Neural Networks for Metagenomics Gene Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2019Article
- Article
- Machine Learning Approaches for Epidemiological Investigations of Food-Borne Disease Outbreaks.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Review
- Feature selection for gene prediction in metagenomic fragments.BioData mining · 2018Article
- Gene Prediction in Metagenomic Fragments with Deep Learning.BioMed research international · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputational gene finding algorithms have proven their robustness in identifying genes in complete genomes. However, metagenomic sequencing has presented new challenges due to the incomplete and fragmented nature of the data. During the last few years, attempts have been made to extract complete and incomplete open reading frames (ORFs) directly from short reads and identify the coding ORFs, bypassing other challenging tasks such as the assembly of the metagenome.
resultsIn this paper we introduce a metagenomics gene caller (MGC) which is an improvement over the state-of-the-art prediction algorithm Orphelia. Orphelia uses a two-stage machine learning approach and computes a model that classifies extracted ORFs from fragmented sequences. We hypothesise and demonstrate evidence that sequences need separate models based on their local GC-content in order to avoid the noise introduced to a single model computed with sequences from the entire GC spectrum. We have also added two amino-acid features based on the benefit of amino-acid usage shown in our previous research. Our algorithm is able to predict genes and translation initiation sites (TIS) more accurately than Orphelia which uses a single model.
conclusionsLearning separate models for several pre-defined GC-content regions as opposed to a single model approach improves the performance of the neural network as demonstrated by the experimental results presented in this paper. The inclusion of amino-acid usage features also helps improve the overall accuracy of our algorithm. MGC's improvement sets the ground for further investigation into the use of GC-content to separate data for training models in machine learning based gene finders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.