ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2013
Early parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients with short-term relative contraindications to early enteral nutrition: a full economic analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial based on US costs.
Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02773771 (Strategies to Reduce Organic Muscle Atrophy in the Intensive Care Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Strategies to Reduce Organic Muscle Atrophy in the Intensive Care Unit (STROMA-ICU)
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost-effectiveness study of early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill children (PEPaNIC): preplanned secondary analysis of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2018Trial
- Impact of protein intervention timings on critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta- analysis.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025Review
- Article
- When is parenteral nutrition indicated?Journal of intensive medicine · 2022Review
- Impact of the Time to Initiation of Parenteral Nutrition on Patient Outcomes in Critically Ill Adults.Nutrition and metabolic insights · 2019Article
- NUTRIREA-2 trial finds that early enteral nutrition and early parenteral nutrition do not differ with regards to major clinical outcomes.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
- Early or Late Feeding after ICU Admission?Nutrients · 2017Review
- Homeostasis alteration within small intestinal mucosa after acute enteral refeeding in total parenteral nutrition mouse model.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2016Article
- Development and current use of parenteral nutrition in critical care - an opinion paper.Critical care (London, England) · 2014Review
- Article
- Timing of (supplemental) parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a systematic review.Annals of intensive care · 2014Review
- Early enteral nutrition in critical illness: a full economic analysis using US costs.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe provision of early enteral (gut) nutrition to critically ill patients, started within 24 hours of injury or intensive care unit admission, is accepted to improve health outcomes. However, not all patients are able to receive early enteral nutrition. The purpose of the economic analysis presented here was to estimate the cost implications of providing early parenteral (intravenous) nutrition to critically ill patients with short-term relative contraindications to early enteral nutrition. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom the perspective of the US acute care hospital system, a cost-minimization analysis was undertaken based on large-scale Monte Carlo simulation (N = 1,000,000 trials) of a stochastic model developed using clinical outcomes and measures of resource consumption reported in a 1,363-patient multicenter clinical trial combined with cost distributions obtained from the published literature. The mean costs of acute care attributable to each study group (early parenteral nutrition versus pragmatic standard care) and the mean cost difference between groups, along with respective 95% confidence intervals, were obtained using the percentile method. RESULTS AND
conclusionThe use of early parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients with short-term relative contraindications to early enteral nutrition may significantly and meaningfully reduce total costs of acute hospital care by US$3,150 per patient (95% confidence interval US$1,314 to US$4,990). These findings were robust, with all sensitivity analyses demonstrating significant savings attributable to the use of early parenteral nutrition, including sensitivity analysis conducted using European cost data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.