Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23900881›Full record

ArticlePharmacognosy research2013

Hepatoprotective effect of commercial herbal extracts on carbon tetrachloride-induced liver damage in Wistar rats.

Paula Cordero-Pérez, Liliana Torres-González, Marcelino Aguirre-Garza, Carlos Camara-Lemarroy, Francisco Guzmán-de la Garza, Gabriela Alarcón-Galván, Homero Zapata-Chavira, Ma de Jesús Sotelo-Gallegos, Cipactli Nadjedja Torres-Esquivel, Ethel Sánchez-Fresno and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacognosy research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Development of a Hepatoprotective Herbal Drug fromEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paula Cordero-PérezLiver Unit, Gastroenterology Service from Department of Internal Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Av. Gonzalitos S/N Col. Mitras Centro C.P., Monterrey, Nuevo León, México.
Liliana Torres-González
Marcelino Aguirre-Garza
Carlos Camara-Lemarroy
Francisco Guzmán-de la Garza
Gabriela Alarcón-Galván
Homero Zapata-Chavira
Ma de Jesús Sotelo-Gallegos
Cipactli Nadjedja Torres-Esquivel
Ethel Sánchez-Fresno
Daniel Cantú-Sepúlveda
Gerardo González-Saldivar
Judith Bernal-Ramirez
Linda E Muñoz-Espinosa
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious hepatoprotective herbal products from plants are available in Mexico, where up to 85% of patients with liver disease use some form of complementary and alternative medicine. However, only few studies have reported on the biological evaluation of these products.

objectiveUsing a model of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced hepatotoxicity in rats, we evaluated the effects of commercial herbal extracts used most commonly in the metropolitan area of Monterrey, Mexico. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe commercial products were identified through surveys in public areas. The effect of these products given with or without CCl4 in rats was evaluated by measuring the serum concentrations of aspartate amino transferase (AST) and alanine amino transferase (ALT), and histopathological analysis. Legalon(®) was used as the standard drug.

resultsThe most commonly used herbal products were Hepatisan(®) capsules, Boldo capsules, Hepavida(®) capsules, Boldo infusion, and milk thistle herbal supplement (80% silymarin). None of the products tested was hepatotoxic according to transaminase and histological analyses. AST and ALT activities were significantly lower in the Hepavida+CCl4-treated group as compared with the CCl4-only group. AST and ALT activities in the silymarin, Hepatisan, and Boldo tea groups were similar to those in the CCl4 group. The CCl4 group displayed submassive confluent necrosis and mixed inflammatory infiltration. Both the Hepatisan+CCl4 and Boldo tea+CCl4 groups exhibited ballooning degeneration, inflammatory infiltration, and lytic necrosis. The silymarin+CCl4 group exhibited microvesicular steatosis. The Hepavida+CCl4- and Legalon+CCL4-treated groups had lower percentages of necrotic cells as compared with the CCl4-treated group; this treatment was hepatoprotective against necrosis.

conclusionOnly Hepavida had a hepatoprotective effect.

Indexed as

Alanine transferaseaspartate transferasehepatoprotectionliver injurynatural products

Identifiers

PMID23900881
PMCPMC3719254
OpenAlexW2077862972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.