Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23900682›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2013

Cell cycle regulation during neurogenesis in the embryonic and adult brain.

Arquimedes Cheffer, Attila Tárnok, Henning Ulrich

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The E3 ubiquitin ligase APC/CThe EMBO journal · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The cellular and molecular basis of cnidarian neurogenesis.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arquimedes ChefferDepartamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de Química, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Attila Tárnok
Henning Ulrich
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Throughout the development of the central nervous system, neural crest cells and the primary neural stem cells originate several non-neuronal and neuronal cell types. Undifferentiated stem cells exist in the adult brain, mainly in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus and in the subventricular zone of the lateral ventricles, and can produce new neurons, participating in brain plasticity and tissue regeneration. Neurogenesis in the embryonic and adult brain occurs under the control of intrinsic and extrinsic factors. However, the mechanisms, by which cell cycle components control neural stem cell proliferation and consequently neurogenesis, still lack further investigation. We discuss here recent knowledge obtained on cell cycle components as key regulators of neural stem and progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation in the embryonic and adult brain.

Indexed as

Cell CycleNeurogenesisAnimalsBrainCell Cycle ProteinsCell ProliferationHumansNeural Stem CellsCell Cycle Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23900682
OpenAlexW2050285488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.