ReviewDer Pathologe2013
[Novel morphological and molecular aspects of lung cancer].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Lung cancer: developments, concepts, and specific aspects of the new WHO classification.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2016Review
- [Diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction of non-small cell lung cancer. Importance of morphology, immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology].Der Pathologe · 2015Review
- A 2015 update on predictive molecular pathology and its role in targeted cancer therapy: a review focussing on clinical relevance.Cancer gene therapy · 2015Review
- [Molecular diagnostics of non-small cell lung cancer: New markers and technologies].Der Pathologe · 2015Review
- [Molecular pathology of lung cancer. State of the art 2014].Der Pathologe · 2014Review
- [Lung cancer. Developments, concepts and preview of the new WHO classification].Der Pathologe · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years the classification of pulmonary cancer has seen a paradigm shift with respect to both morphological as well as molecular aspects. On the morphological side this includes novel criteria for tumor classification from biopsy material based on morphological and immunohistochemical aspects as well as a novel classification based on morphological patterns for pulmonary adenocarcinomas. In addition, this new classification now includes adenocarcinoma in situ as well as minimally invasive adenocarcinoma as novel entities and a variety of novel adenocarcinoma subtypes. This reclassification was accompanied and complemented by tremendous developments in the field of lung cancer genomics which paved the way for now widely established predictive molecular markers, e.g. epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and EML4-ALK translocations and will certainly lead to a variety of novel predictive markers not only for pulmonary adenocarcinoma but also for other pulmonary neoplasms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.