Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23900577›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2013

Additive hindfoot arthrodesis for rheumatoid hindfoot disease: a clinical study of patient outcomes and satisfaction.

Nicholas E Ohly, Steffen J Breusch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicholas E OhlyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
Steffen J Breusch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced rheumatoid hindfoot disease causes significant pain and disability. Hindfoot arthrodesis is a useful procedure but is often overlooked as a treatment option. The objective of this study was to report the improvements in patients' health, pain, functional ability and satisfaction following this procedure. Thirty-seven patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were recruited from the outpatient clinic and underwent 42 hindfoot arthrodesis procedures by a single surgeon. Outcome measures were SF12 score, Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire index score, visual analogue pain score and satisfaction scores, as well as radiographic assessment. Assessment was undertaken at the pre-admission clinic and at 6 and 12 months post-operatively. Statistically significant improvements were seen at 6 and 12 months in all measured outcomes. The union rate was 97.6%. The satisfaction rate was 92.5%. The complication rate was 7.1%. The functional benefit and outcome scores are comparable to those reported following hip and knee replacement in patients with RA. The findings of this study provide evidence that hindfoot arthrodesis should be considered a worthwhile surgical treatment in the rheumatoid patient with advanced hindfoot disease. Healthcare professionals involved in the management of these patients should be aware of the potential benefits of this procedure and refer early to a foot and ankle surgeon specialist when conservative treatment modalities have failed.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnkleAnkle JointArthritis, RheumatoidArthrodesisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionRecovery of FunctionSurgical Procedures, OperativeSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.