ArticleClinical rheumatology2013
Additive hindfoot arthrodesis for rheumatoid hindfoot disease: a clinical study of patient outcomes and satisfaction.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of midfoot and Hindfoot involvement on functional disability in Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2017Article
- The foot function index is more sensitive to change than the Leeds Foot Impact Scale for evaluating rheumatoid arthritis patients after forefoot or hindfoot reconstruction.International orthopaedics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced rheumatoid hindfoot disease causes significant pain and disability. Hindfoot arthrodesis is a useful procedure but is often overlooked as a treatment option. The objective of this study was to report the improvements in patients' health, pain, functional ability and satisfaction following this procedure. Thirty-seven patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were recruited from the outpatient clinic and underwent 42 hindfoot arthrodesis procedures by a single surgeon. Outcome measures were SF12 score, Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire index score, visual analogue pain score and satisfaction scores, as well as radiographic assessment. Assessment was undertaken at the pre-admission clinic and at 6 and 12 months post-operatively. Statistically significant improvements were seen at 6 and 12 months in all measured outcomes. The union rate was 97.6%. The satisfaction rate was 92.5%. The complication rate was 7.1%. The functional benefit and outcome scores are comparable to those reported following hip and knee replacement in patients with RA. The findings of this study provide evidence that hindfoot arthrodesis should be considered a worthwhile surgical treatment in the rheumatoid patient with advanced hindfoot disease. Healthcare professionals involved in the management of these patients should be aware of the potential benefits of this procedure and refer early to a foot and ankle surgeon specialist when conservative treatment modalities have failed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23900577What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.