Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23900412›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2013

Proteostasis in complex dendrites.

Cyril Hanus, Erin M Schuman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Neuronal Golgi Network and Its Acolytes.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. RNA in axons, dendrites, synapses and beyond.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Attractor and integrator networks in the brain.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. A Ribosomal Perspective on Neuronal Local Protein Synthesis.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cyril HanusThe Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Max von Laue Strasse 4, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany.
Erin M Schuman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Like all cells, neurons are made of proteins that have characteristic synthesis and degradation profiles. Unlike other cells, however, neurons have a unique multipolar architecture that makes ∼10,000 synaptic contacts with other neurons. Both the stability and modifiability of the neuronal proteome are crucial for its information-processing, storage and plastic properties. The cell biological mechanisms that synthesize, modify, deliver and degrade dendritic and synaptic proteins are not well understood but appear to reflect unique solutions adapted to the particular morphology of neurons.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CompartmentationDendritesHumansNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuronsPrionsSynapsesNerve Tissue ProteinsPrions

Identifiers

PMID23900412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.