Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23899563›Full record

ReviewPhysiological reviews2013

Placebo and the new physiology of the doctor-patient relationship.

Fabrizio Benedetti

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05218564 (Air as a Placebo), which is not on this map. Cited by 158 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05218564 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Air as a Placebo: Increasing the Respiratory Performance of People With COPD Through Simple Expectations of Improvement. An Experimental, Randomised, Two-arm, Counterbalanced Study With Three Data Collection Sessions.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETSRan2020 to 2022Enrolled102ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseArmsOxygen Therapy, Compressed Medical Air
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Placebo effects of caffeine on sport performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Placebo effects in low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2021 · on this map
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fabrizio BenedettiDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Turin Medical School, and National Institute of Neuroscience, Turin, Italy. fabrizio.benedetti@unito.it

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern medicine has progressed in parallel with the advancement of biochemistry, anatomy, and physiology. By using the tools of modern medicine, the physician today can treat and prevent a number of diseases through pharmacology, genetics, and physical interventions. Besides this materia medica, the patient's mind, cognitions, and emotions play a central part as well in any therapeutic outcome, as investigated by disciplines such as psychoneuroendocrinoimmunology. This review describes recent findings that give scientific evidence to the old tenet that patients must be both cured and cared for. In fact, we are today in a good position to investigate complex psychological factors, like placebo effects and the doctor-patient relationship, by using a physiological and neuroscientific approach. These intricate psychological factors can be approached through biochemistry, anatomy, and physiology, thus eliminating the old dichotomy between biology and psychology. This is both a biomedical and a philosophical enterprise that is changing the way we approach and interpret medicine and human biology. In the first case, curing the disease only is not sufficient, and care of the patient is of tantamount importance. In the second case, the philosophical debate about the mind-body interaction can find some important answers in the study of placebo effects. Therefore, maybe paradoxically, the placebo effect and the doctor-patient relationship can be approached by using the same biochemical, cellular and physiological tools of the materia medica, which represents an epochal transition from general concepts such as suggestibility and power of mind to a true physiology of the doctor-patient interaction.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsPlacebo EffectBrainHumansPlacebosPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID23899563
PMCPMC3962549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.