Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23898302›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2013

Association of cardiovascular risk using non-linear heart rate variability measures with the framingham risk score in a rural population.

Herbert F Jelinek, Hasan Md Imam, Hayder Al-Aubaidy, Ahsan H Khandoker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. The perils of being too stable: mood regulation in bipolar disorderJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2018
    Article
  7. Heart Rate Variability in Coexisting Diabetes and Hypertension.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Complexity Change in Cardiovascular Disease.International journal of biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Herbert F JelinekDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research Abu Dhabi, UAE ; Australian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University Sydney, NSW, Australia ; Centre for Research in Complex Systems and the School of Community Health Albury, NSW, Australia.
Hasan Md Imam
Hayder Al-Aubaidy
Ahsan H Khandoker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular risk can be calculated using the Framingham cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk score and provides a risk stratification from mild to very high CVD risk percentage over 10 years. This equation represents a complex interaction between age, gender, cholesterol status, blood pressure, diabetes status, and smoking. Heart rate variability (HRV) is a measure of how the autonomic nervous system (ANS) modulates the heart rate. HRV measures are sensitive to age, gender, disease status such as diabetes and hypertension and processes leading to atherosclerosis. We investigated whether HRV measures are a suitable, simple, noninvasive alternative to differentiate between the four main Framingham associated CVD risk categories. In this study we applied the tone-entropy (T-E) algorithm and complex correlation measure (CCM) for analysis of HRV obtained from 20 min. ECG recordings and correlated the HRV score with the stratification results using the Framingham risk equation. Both entropy and CCM had significant analysis of variance (ANOVA) results [F (172, 3) = 9.51; <0.0001]. Bonferroni post hoc analysis indicated a significant difference between mild, high and very high cardiac risk groups applying tone-entropy (p < 0.01). CCM detected a difference in temporal dynamics of the RR intervals between the mild and very high CVD risk groups (p < 0.01). Our results indicate a good agreement between the T-E and CCM algorithm and the Framingham CVD risk score, suggesting that this algorithm may be of use for initial screening of cardiovascular risk as it is noninvasive, economical and easy to use in clinical practice.

Indexed as

cardiovascular risk factorcomplex correlation meausresFramingham risk factornon-linear hear rate variability analysisPoincare plottone-entropy

Identifiers

PMID23898302
PMCPMC3724049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.