Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23897892›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2013

A new method for high-resolution imaging of Ku foci to decipher mechanisms of DNA double-strand break repair.

Sébastien Britton, Julia Coates, Stephen P Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 174 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
174citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

174 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sébastien BrittonThe Wellcome Trust and Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1QN, England, UK.
Julia Coates
Stephen P Jackson

Funding

Investigating DNA repair vulnerabilities in oncometabolite producing cancersF31CA260794 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NORONHA, KATELYN · 2021 to 2023
$122k
Cancer Research UK 11224Cancer Research UK A11224Cancer Research UK C6946/A14492Cancer Research UK C6/A11224European Research Council 268536NCI NIH HHS F31 CA260794Wellcome Trust 092096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most toxic of all genomic insults, and pathways dealing with their signaling and repair are crucial to prevent cancer and for immune system development. Despite intense investigations, our knowledge of these pathways has been technically limited by our inability to detect the main repair factors at DSBs in cells. In this paper, we present an original method that involves a combination of ribonuclease- and detergent-based preextraction with high-resolution microscopy. This method allows direct visualization of previously hidden repair complexes, including the main DSB sensor Ku, at virtually any type of DSB, including those induced by anticancer agents. We demonstrate its broad range of applications by coupling it to laser microirradiation, super-resolution microscopy, and single-molecule counting to investigate the spatial organization and composition of repair factories. Furthermore, we use our method to monitor DNA repair and identify mechanisms of repair pathway choice, and we show its utility in defining cellular sensitivities and resistance mechanisms to anticancer agents.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairAnimalsAntigens, NuclearCells, CulturedDNA-Binding ProteinsHumansKu AutoantigenMiceMicroscopyAntigens, NuclearDNA-Binding ProteinsKu AutoantigenXrcc6 protein, humanXrcc6 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID23897892
PMCPMC3734090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.