Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23896973›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2013

Left atrial isthmus line ablation using a remote robotic navigation system: feasibility, efficacy and long-term outcome.

Andreas Rillig, Boris Schmidt, Britta Feige, Erik Wissner, Andreas Metzner, Anita Arya, Shibu Mathew, Hisaki Makimoto, Peter Wohlmuth, Feifan Ouyang and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Atrial fibrillation and long-term sports practice: epidemiology and mechanisms.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2015
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Uncommon delayed and late complications after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with Amplatzer(®) Cardiac Plug.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas RilligDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Lohmühlenstr. 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany, arillig5@yahoo.de.
Boris Schmidt
Britta Feige
Erik Wissner
Andreas Metzner
Anita Arya
Shibu Mathew
Hisaki Makimoto
Peter Wohlmuth
Feifan Ouyang
Karl-Heinz Kuck
Roland Richard Tilz
Asklepios Klinik St. Georg · DEAsklepios · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeft atrial isthmus (LAI)-ablation in addition to circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) may improve outcomes in select patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, bidirectional LAI-block is difficult to obtain. No systematic evaluation reporting on the feasibility and efficacy of LAI-ablation using a robotic navigation system (RNS) exists. METHODS AND

resultsIn this pilot study, CPVI combined with LAI-ablation were performed using a RNS and 3D-mapping system in 42 patients with persistent (n = 24, 57.1 %) or longstanding persistent AF. Ablation was performed using either a 3.5 mm irrigated tip catheter (ITC) with 6 (group-A, n = 16; max. 40 W, contact force 10-40 g) or (after a steam pop occurred in one patient) with a 4 mm ITC with 12 irrigation holes (group-B, n = 26; max. 30 W, contact force 10-30 g). Epicardial ablation was performed manually whenever bidirectional LAI-block could not be obtained with a maximum of 20 endocardial RF-applications. LAI-conduction block was achieved in all patients using RNS; in six patients (14.3 %), additional epicardial ablation was required to achieve LAI-block. A steam pop occurred during LAI-ablation resulting in cardiac tamponade in one patient in group-A. After a median follow-up period of 21 months, arrhythmia recurrence was seen in in 23/42 patients (18 patients with AF and 5 patients with atrial tachycardia) and repeat procedure was performed in 12 (28.6 %) patients; recovered LAI-conduction was found in 5/12 (41.7 %) patients. The RNS-group was compared to a historical group of 20 patients with manual LAI-ablation. Using RNS, LAI-block was more often achieved (42 (100 %) vs 16 (80 %), p < 0.01) and epicardial ablation was required in a significantly smaller number of patients (6 (14.3) vs 10 (50 %), p < 0.01).

conclusionsLAI-ablation using RNS appears to be feasible in all patients. At repeat procedure, LAI-conduction can frequently occur; power and contact-force adaption appears to be mandatory to reduce the risk of complications. Using RNS, instead of a manual approach for LAI-line ablation may facilitate creation of a bidirectional LAI-block.

Indexed as

RoboticsAgedAtrial FibrillationCatheter AblationFeasibility StudiesFollow-Up StudiesHeart AtriaHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesPulmonary VeinsRecurrenceReoperation

Identifiers

PMID23896973
OpenAlexW2051915512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.