Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23896754›Full record

SynthesisDigestive diseases and sciences2013

Ursodiol and colorectal cancer or dysplasia risk in primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis.

Jonathan D Hansen, Sonal Kumar, Wai-Kit Lo, David M Poulsen, Umme-Aiman Halai, Kathy C Tater

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of primary sclerosing cholangitis (2021)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. ACG Clinical Guideline: Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2015
    Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Current Therapeutics in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Primary sclerosing cholangitis.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan D HansenHarvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, jdh817@mail.harvard.edu.
Sonal Kumar
Wai-Kit Lo
David M Poulsen
Umme-Aiman Halai
Kathy C Tater
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and colonic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) demonstrate increased risk of colorectal cancer. Prior studies have yielded conflicting information on the relationship between ursodiol (UDCA) and the risk of colorectal cancer or dysplasia in this group.

aimsTo examine the impact of UDCA on risk of colorectal cancer or dysplasia in adult PSC and IBD patients.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies was performed. Subgroup analysis compared the effects of "low-to-medium" (<25 mg/kg/day) versus "high" dose (≥ 25 mg/kg/day) UDCA exposures.

resultsInclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as all variables, were determined a priori. Seven papers, with 707 participants and greater than 5,751 person-years of follow-up time, met the criteria for final analysis. The overall pooled relative risk using a random effects model was not statistically significant (RR = 0.87, 95 % CI 0.51-1.49, p = 0.62). Subgroup analysis by UDCA dose category in a random effects model was not statistically significant (RR = 0.64, 95 % CI 0.38-1.07, p = 0.09), but suggested a possible trend in risk reduction at low-to-medium-dose exposures that may warrant further investigation.

conclusionUDCA use was not associated with risk of colorectal cancer or dysplasia in adult PSC and IBD patients, but UDCA dose was a source of heterogeneity across studies. Subgroup analysis suggests a possible trend toward decreased colorectal cancer risk in low-to-medium-dose exposures. Additional study of UDCA treatments at low doses in PSC and IBD patients may be warranted.

Indexed as

Cholangitis, SclerosingColorectal NeoplasmsHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesRisk FactorsUrsodeoxycholic AcidUrsodeoxycholic Acid

Identifiers

PMID23896754
OpenAlexW2055807770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.