Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23896649›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2013

A universal method for sequential immunofluorescent analysis of chromatin and chromatin-associated proteins on chromosome spreads.

Christine van de Werken, Holger Jahr, Margarida Avo Santos, Cindy Eleveld, Joyce Schuilwerve, Joop S E Laven, Esther B Baart

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christine van de WerkenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. c.vandewerken@erasmusmc.nl
Holger Jahr
Margarida Avo Santos
Cindy Eleveld
Joyce Schuilwerve
Joop S E Laven
Esther B Baart

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunofluorescence has been widely used to study histone modification dynamics and chromosome-associated proteins that regulate the segregation of chromosomes during cell divisions. Since many of these regulatory proteins interact (in)directly to exert their proper function, it is of interest to detect these proteins simultaneously, to establish their spatiotemporal relation. However, the detection of multiple epitopes on the same material is limited by the availability of antibodies derived from different host species. For Western blot membranes, buffers were developed to remove antibodies after the first round of detection and enable a second round of detection. In this study, we establish that this "stripping" principle can also be applied for sequential immunofluorescence on chromosome preparations. We first adapted a drying down fixation technique for the use on cultured cells from different primary cells and cell lines. These chromosome spreads were subsequently used to optimize the stripping procedure for this application. We investigated feasibility and reliability of detection of histones and their posttranslational modifications as well as chromatin interacting proteins in two subsequent rounds of immunofluorescence. We conclude that this method is a reliable option when spatial resolution and co-expression need to be investigated and the material or the choice of antibodies is limited.

Indexed as

Fluorescent Antibody TechniqueAnimalsCell LineChromatinChromosomes, MammalianFemaleHumansMaleMiceNucleoproteinsChromatinNucleoproteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.