Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23895665›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2013

Comparison of laboratory costs of rapid molecular tests and conventional diagnostics for detection of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa.

Maunank Shah, Violet Chihota, Gerrit Coetzee, Gavin Churchyard, Susan E Dorman

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Time-and-motion tool for the assessment of working time in tuberculosis laboratories: a multicentre study.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Maunank ShahJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, 1503 East Jefferson St, Room 118, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA. Mshah28@JHMI.EDU
Violet Chihota
Gerrit Coetzee
Gavin Churchyard
Susan E Dorman
Aurum Institute · ZAJohns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNational Health Laboratory Service · ZA

Funding

Implementation Science Approaches for Novel TB Diagnostics in HIV Prevalent AreasK23AI089259 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SHAH, MAUNANK · 2011 to 2015
$681k
Rapid Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosisK23AI051528 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DORMAN, SUSAN E · 2003 to 2007
$657k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI089259NIAID NIH HHS K23AI089259NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI51528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization has endorsed the use of molecular methods for the detection of TB and drug-resistant TB as a rapid alternative to culture-based systems. In South Africa, the Xpert MTB/Rif assay and the GenoType MTBDRplus have been implemented into reference laboratories for diagnosis of TB and drug-resistance, but their costs have not been fully elucidated.

methodsWe conducted a detailed reference laboratory cost analysis of new rapid molecular assays (Xpert and MTBDRplus) for tuberculosis testing and drug-resistance testing in South Africa, and compared with the costs of conventional approaches involving sputum microscopy, liquid mycobacterial culture, and phenotypic drug sensitivity testing.

resultsFrom a laboratory perspective, Xpert MTB/RIF cost $14.93/sample and the MTBDRplus line probe assay cost $23.46/sample, compared to $16.88/sample using conventional automated liquid culture-based methods. Laboratory costs of Xpert and MTBDRplus were most influenced by cost of consumables (60-80%).

conclusionsAt current public sector pricing, Xpert MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus are comparable in cost to mycobacterial culture and conventional drug sensitivity testing. Overall, reference laboratories must balance costs with performance characteristics and the need for rapid results.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBacterial Typing TechniquesHumansMicroscopy, FluorescenceMycobacterium tuberculosisSouth AfricaTuberculosisTuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant

Identifiers

PMID23895665
PMCPMC3733609
OpenAlexW2156110840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.