Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23895578›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2013

Reduction of needlestick injuries in healthcare personnel at a university hospital using safety devices.

Cornelia Hoffmann, Lutz Buchholz, Paul Schnitzler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bioresponsive transcutaneous patches.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Stress and Fear of Exposure to Sharps in Nurses.Iranian journal of psychiatry and behavioral sciences · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Medical work assessment in German hospitals: a study protocol of a movement sequence analysis (MAGRO-MSA).Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2015
    Article
  17. Infection control best practices in clinical research in resource-limited settings.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2014
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cornelia HoffmannDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Virology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany. Paul_Schnitzler@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Lutz Buchholz
Paul Schnitzler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare personnel (HCP) is exposed to bloodborne pathogens through occupational risk factors. The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of needlestick injuries (NSIs) before and after the introduction of safety devices in all departments of our hospital.

methodsData was extracted from mandatory needlestick report forms of the hospital's Occupational Health Service. Serological results of patients and healthcare personnel (HCP) were reviewed in the laboratory information system.

resultsIn 2007, the year before the introduction of safety devices, 448 needlestick injuries were self-reported, corresponding to an annual rate of 69.0 NSIs per 1 000 full-time HCP. The highest incidence was observed among medical staff in the surgery department and internal medicine with 152 (33.9%) and 79 (17.6%) NSIs, respectively. Of all occupational groups, nurses (36.2%) had the highest risk to sustain NSIs. In 2008 safety devices were introduced across the hospital, e.g. peripheral venous catheter, hypodermic needle and stapling system for wound sealing providing active or passive protection. In 2009, the year after introduction of safety devices, only 350 NSIs were reported, the annual rate of NSIs decreased to 52.4 per 1 000 full-time HCP. Thus an overall reduction of 21.9% for NSIs was achieved when safer devices were applied. The number of NSIs was reduced by even 50% for blood withdrawal, for use of peripheral venous catheters and application of hypodermic needles.

conclusionThe application of safety devices led to a reduction of NSIs and significantly reduces the risk of bloodborne infections.

Identifiers

PMID23895578
PMCPMC3728001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.