Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23895557›Full record

Trial reportAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2013

Effects of family history of alcohol dependence on the subjective response to alcohol using the intravenous alcohol clamp.

Karin Kerfoot, Brian Pittman, Elizabeth Ralevski, Diana Limoncelli, Julia Koretski, Jenelle Newcomb, Albert J Arias, Ismene L Petrakis

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Ghrelin Predicts Stimulant and Sedative Effects of Alcohol in Heavy Drinkers.Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire) · 2023
    Article
  9. Moderators of subjective response to alcohol in the human laboratory.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. To Infuse or Ingest in Human Laboratory Alcohol Research.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karin KerfootNIAAA Center for the Translational Neuroscience of Alcoholism and Department of Psychiatry , Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Veterans Affairs , Alcohol Research Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System (116-A), West Haven, Connecticut; Department of Psychiatry , University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Brian Pittman
Elizabeth Ralevski
Diana Limoncelli
Julia Koretski
Jenelle Newcomb
Albert J Arias
Ismene L Petrakis
VA Connecticut Healthcare System · USYale University · USNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism · US

Funding

Translational Technologies CoreP50AA012870 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Matthew J Girgenti · 2001 to 2026
$43.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS 2P50-AA012870-07NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA012870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlcohol use disorders are well recognized to be common, debilitating, and the risk of developing them is influenced by family history (FH). The subjective response to alcohol may be determined familialy and related to the risk of developing alcoholism. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences between family history positive (FHP) and family history negative (FHN) individuals in their response to alcohol within the domains of subjective, coordination, and cognitive effects using an intravenous (IV) clamping method of alcohol administration.

methodsTwo groups of healthy subjects, those with an FHP (n = 65) versus those who were FHN (n = 115), between the ages of 21 to 30, participated in 3 test days. Subjects were scheduled to receive placebo, low-dose ethanol (EtOH) (target breath alcohol clamping [BrAC] = 40 mg%), and high-dose EtOH (target BrAC = 100 mg%) on 3 separate test days at least 3 days apart in a randomized order under double-blind conditions. Outcome measures included subjective effects, measures of coordination, and cognitive function.

resultsBoth low- and high-dose alcohol led to dose-related stimulant and sedative subjective effects as measured the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale and subjective measures of "high" and "drowsy" measured on a visual analog scale. However, there were no effects of FH. Similar dose-related effects were observed on cognitive and coordination-related outcomes, but were not moderated FH.

conclusionsResults from this study showed that healthy individuals responded to an IV alcohol challenge in a dose-related manner; however, there were no significant differences on subjective response, or on EtOH-induced impairment of coordination or cognition, between individuals with a positive FH for alcoholism and those with a negative FH. Results suggest that FH may not be a specific enough marker of risk, particularly in individuals who are beyond the age where alcohol use disorders often develop.

Indexed as

AdultAlcoholismCognitionDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodEthanolFemaleHumansMalePlacebosPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeYoung AdultEthanolPlacebosAlcohol ClampAlcohol DependenceFamily HistoryHealthy SubjectsIV Alcohol

Identifiers

PMID23895557
PMCPMC3971638
OpenAlexW2154965918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.