Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23895403›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2013

The effectiveness of a web-based brief alcohol intervention in reducing heavy drinking among adolescents aged 15-20 years with a low educational background: a two-arm parallel group cluster randomized controlled trial.

Carmen V Voogt, Marloes Kleinjan, Evelien A P Poelen, Lex A C J Lemmers, Rutger C M E Engels

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevention of alcohol use in older teens: A randomized trial of an online family prevention program.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2019
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A research agenda for gender and substance use disorders in the emergency department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carmen V VoogtRadboud University Nijmegen, Behavioural Science Institute, P,O, Box 9104, 6500, HE Nijmegen, the Netherlands. c.voogt@bsi.ru.nl.
Marloes Kleinjan
Evelien A P Poelen
Lex A C J Lemmers
Rutger C M E Engels
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLTrimbos Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the slightly modified version of the web-based brief alcohol intervention "What Do You Drink" (WDYD) among heavy drinking adolescents and young adults aged 15-20 years with a low educational background at one and six months follow-up.

methodsA two-arm parallel group cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted online in the Netherlands in 2011-2012. Participants included in the trial were recruited from preparatory and secondary vocational education institutions and had to be between 15 and 20 years of age and report heavy drinking in the past six months. In total, 73 classes representing 609 (59.9% male) participants were allocated to the experimental condition (37 classes, 318 participants: WDYD intervention) or control condition (36 classes, 291 participants: no intervention). Outcomes were heavy drinking, weekly alcohol consumption, and frequency of binge drinking.

resultsRegressions analyses revealed no significant main intervention effects on any of the alcohol outcomes at one and six month's follow-up according to the intention-to-treat principle. Additionally, there were no moderating effects of gender, age, educational level, and readiness to change on the relation between the WDYD intervention and the alcohol outcomes at follow-up.

conclusionsThe WDYD intervention was not effective in reducing alcohol consumption among heavy drinking adolescents and young adults aged 15-20 years with a low educational background at one and six months follow-up. However, the absence of intervention effectiveness cannot be used as an argument for not conducting these types of interventions with low educated individuals, since our study was the first to target this population.

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register NTR2971.

Indexed as

CounselingAdolescentAdultAlcohol DrinkingBinge DrinkingEducational StatusEthanolFemaleHumansInternetMaleNetherlandsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultEthanol

Identifiers

PMID23895403
PMCPMC3751742
OpenAlexW2110385258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.