Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23895175›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2014

Corneal stromal cell plasticity: in vitro regulation of cell phenotype through cell-cell interactions in a three-dimensional model.

Samantha L Wilson, Ying Yang, Alicia J El Haj

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Isolation and Culture of Corneal Stromal Stem Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. 3D Stacked Construct: A Novel Substitute for Corneal Tissue Engineering.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018
    Article
  9. Alternatives toToxicological research · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Quercetin modulates keratoconus metabolism in vitro.Cell biochemistry and function · 2015
    Article
  12. The roles of cellular nanomechanics in cancer.Medicinal research reviews · 2015
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samantha L WilsonInstitute for Science and Technology in Medicine, School of Medicine, Keele University , Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom .
Ying Yang
Alicia J El Haj
Keele University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo, epithelial cells are connected both anatomically and functionally with stromal keratocytes. Co-culturing aims at recapturing this cellular anatomy and functionality by bringing together two or more cell types within the same culture environment. Corneal stromal cells were activated to their injury phenotype (fibroblasts) and expanded before being encapsulated in type I collagen hydrogels constructs. Three different epithelial-stromal co-culture methods were then examined: epithelial explant; transwell; and the use of conditioned media. The aim was to determine whether the native, inactivated keratocyte cell phenotype could be restored in vitro. Media supplementation with transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-β1) was then used to determine whether the inactivated stromal cells retained their plasticity in vitro and could be re-activated to the fibroblast phenotype. Finally, media supplementation with wortmannin was used to inhibit epithelial-stromal cell interactions. Two different nondestructive techniques, spherical indentation and optical coherence tomography, were used to reveal how epithelial-stromal co-culturing with TGF-β1, and wortmannin media supplementation, respectively, affect stromal cell behavior and differentiation in terms of construct contraction and elastic modulus measurement. Cell viability, phenotype, morphology, and protein expression were investigated to corroborate our mechanical findings. It was shown that activated stromal cells could be inactivated to a keratocyte phenotype via co-culturing and that they retained their plasticity in vitro. Activated corneal stromal cells that were fibroblastic in phenotype were successfully reverted to a nonactivated keratocyte cell lineage in terms of behavior and biological properties; and then back again via TGF-β1 media supplementation. It was then revealed that epithelial-stromal interactions can be blocked via the use of wortmannin inhibition. A greater understanding of stromal-epithelial interactions and what mediates them offers great pharmacological potential in the regulation of corneal wound healing, with the potential to treat corneal diseases and injury by which such interactions are vital.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationModels, BiologicalAdultAndrostadienesBiomarkersCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCell SurvivalCoculture TechniquesCorneal StromaElastic ModulusEpithelial CellsFibroblastsHumansKeratin-3PhenotypeAndrostadienesBiomarkersKeratin-3Transforming Growth Factor beta1VimentinWortmannin

Identifiers

PMID23895175
PMCPMC3875209
OpenAlexW131608565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.