Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23894661›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Antimicrobial efficacy of two surface barrier discharges with air plasma against in vitro biofilms.

Rutger Matthes, Claudia Bender, Rabea Schlüter, Ina Koban, René Bussiahn, Stephan Reuter, Jürgen Lademann, Klaus-Dieter Weltmann, Axel Kramer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Non-thermal plasma causesFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Fabrication and Performance of a Multi-Discharge Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Array.IEEE transactions on plasma science. IEEE Nuclear and Plasma Sciences Society · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Discharge Device Exerts Antimicrobial Effects.International journal of latest trends in engineering & technology : IJLTET · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rutger MatthesInstitute for Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Claudia Bender
Rabea Schlüter
Ina Koban
René Bussiahn
Stephan Reuter
Jürgen Lademann
Klaus-Dieter Weltmann
Axel Kramer
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DELeibniz Institute for Plasma Science and Technology · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversität Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of infected wounds is one possible therapeutic aspect of plasma medicine. Chronic wounds are often associated with microbial biofilms which limit the efficacy of antiseptics. The present study investigates two different surface barrier discharges with air plasma to compare their efficacy against microbial biofilms with chlorhexidine digluconate solution (CHX) as representative of an important antibiofilm antiseptic. Pseudomonas aeruginosa SG81 and Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A were cultivated on polycarbonate discs. The biofilms were treated for 30, 60, 150, 300 or 600 s with plasma or for 600 s with 0.1% CHX, respectively. After treatment, biofilms were dispensed by ultrasound and the antimicrobial effects were determined as difference in the number of the colony forming units by microbial culture. A high antimicrobial efficacy on biofilms of both plasma sources in comparison to CHX treatment was shown. The efficacy differs between the used strains and plasma sources. For illustration, the biofilms were examined under a scanning electron microscope before and after treatment. Additionally, cytotoxicity was determined by the MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay with L929 mouse fibroblast cell line. The cell toxicity of the used plasma limits its applicability on human tissue to maximally 150 s. The emitted UV irradiance was measured to estimate whether UV could limit the application on human tissue at the given parameters. It was found that the UV emission is negligibly low. In conclusion, the results support the assumption that air plasma could be an option for therapy of chronic wounds.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalBiofilmsChlorhexidinePseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus epidermidisAnti-Infective AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidinechlorhexidine gluconate

Identifiers

PMID23894661
PMCPMC3722131
OpenAlexW2017137022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.