Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23894647›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

PCR-induced transitions are the major source of error in cleaned ultra-deep pyrosequencing data.

Johanna Brodin, Mattias Mild, Charlotte Hedskog, Ellen Sherwood, Thomas Leitner, Björn Andersson, Jan Albert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. NGS-Based Tumor-Informed Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Detecting Somatic Mutations in Normal Cells.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Johanna BrodinDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. johanna.brodin@ki.se
Mattias Mild
Charlotte Hedskog
Ellen Sherwood
Thomas Leitner
Björn Andersson
Jan Albert

Funding

Reconstructing HIV Epidemics from HIV PhylogeneticsR01AI087520 · NIAID · TRIAD NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC · PI Thomas K. Leitner · 2010 to 2026
$11.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI087520NIAID NIH HHS R01AI087520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUltra-deep pyrosequencing (UDPS) is used to identify rare sequence variants. The sequence depth is influenced by several factors including the error frequency of PCR and UDPS. This study investigated the characteristics and source of errors in raw and cleaned UDPS data.

resultsUDPS of a 167-nucleotide fragment of the HIV-1 SG3Δenv plasmid was performed on the Roche/454 platform. The plasmid was diluted to one copy, PCR amplified and subjected to bidirectional UDPS on three occasions. The dataset consisted of 47,693 UDPS reads. Raw UDPS data had an average error frequency of 0.30% per nucleotide site. Most errors were insertions and deletions in homopolymeric regions. We used a cleaning strategy that removed almost all indel errors, but had little effect on substitution errors, which reduced the error frequency to 0.056% per nucleotide. In cleaned data the error frequency was similar in homopolymeric and non-homopolymeric regions, but varied considerably across sites. These site-specific error frequencies were moderately, but still significantly, correlated between runs (r=0.15-0.65) and between forward and reverse sequencing directions within runs (r=0.33-0.65). Furthermore, transition errors were 48-times more common than transversion errors (0.052% vs. 0.001%; p<0.0001). Collectively the results indicate that a considerable proportion of the sequencing errors that remained after data cleaning were generated during the PCR that preceded UDPS.

conclusionsA majority of the sequencing errors that remained after data cleaning were introduced by PCR prior to sequencing, which means that they will be independent of platform used for next-generation sequencing. The transition vs. transversion error bias in cleaned UDPS data will influence the detection limits of rare mutations and sequence variants.

Indexed as

ArtifactsBase SequenceHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHIV-1Polymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID23894647
PMCPMC3720931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.