ArticlePloS one2013
PCR-induced transitions are the major source of error in cleaned ultra-deep pyrosequencing data.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed.
- An RNA structural switch controlling bacterial toxin translation.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- The human mycobiome: a critical yet understudied component of health and disease.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2025Review
- Chasing Sequencing Perfection: Marching Toward Higher Accuracy and Lower Costs.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2024Review
- NGS-Based Tumor-Informed Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Article
- Review
- Article
- MIPP-Seq: ultra-sensitive rapid detection and validation of low-frequency mosaic mutations.BMC medical genomics · 2021Article
- Bias in RNA-seq Library Preparation: Current Challenges and Solutions.BioMed research international · 2021Review
- Contamination Issue in Viral Metagenomics: Problems, Solutions, and Clinical Perspectives.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Dual Deep Sequencing Improves the Accuracy of Low-Frequency Somatic Mutation Detection in Cancer Gene Panel Testing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- SinoDuplex: An Improved Duplex Sequencing Approach to Detect Low-frequency Variants in Plasma cfDNA Samples.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2020Article
- The Transcriptomic Toolbox: Resources for Interpreting Large Gene Expression Data within a Precision Medicine Context for Metabolic Disease Atherosclerosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2019Article
- The use of technical replication for detection of low-level somatic mutations in next-generation sequencing.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Patterns of PCR Amplification Artifacts of the Fungal Barcode Marker in a Hybrid Mushroom.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Ultra-deep amplicon sequencing indicates absence of low-grade mosaicism with normal cells in patients with type-1 NF1 deletions.Human genetics · 2019Article
- Detecting Somatic Mutations in Normal Cells.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2018Review
- Evolution of HIV-1 within untreated individuals and at the population scale in Uganda.PLoS pathogens · 2018Article
- MERIT reveals the impact of genomic context on sequencing error rate in ultra-deep applications.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- An optimized targeted Next-Generation Sequencing approach for sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants.Biomolecular detection and quantification · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUltra-deep pyrosequencing (UDPS) is used to identify rare sequence variants. The sequence depth is influenced by several factors including the error frequency of PCR and UDPS. This study investigated the characteristics and source of errors in raw and cleaned UDPS data.
resultsUDPS of a 167-nucleotide fragment of the HIV-1 SG3Δenv plasmid was performed on the Roche/454 platform. The plasmid was diluted to one copy, PCR amplified and subjected to bidirectional UDPS on three occasions. The dataset consisted of 47,693 UDPS reads. Raw UDPS data had an average error frequency of 0.30% per nucleotide site. Most errors were insertions and deletions in homopolymeric regions. We used a cleaning strategy that removed almost all indel errors, but had little effect on substitution errors, which reduced the error frequency to 0.056% per nucleotide. In cleaned data the error frequency was similar in homopolymeric and non-homopolymeric regions, but varied considerably across sites. These site-specific error frequencies were moderately, but still significantly, correlated between runs (r=0.15-0.65) and between forward and reverse sequencing directions within runs (r=0.33-0.65). Furthermore, transition errors were 48-times more common than transversion errors (0.052% vs. 0.001%; p<0.0001). Collectively the results indicate that a considerable proportion of the sequencing errors that remained after data cleaning were generated during the PCR that preceded UDPS.
conclusionsA majority of the sequencing errors that remained after data cleaning were introduced by PCR prior to sequencing, which means that they will be independent of platform used for next-generation sequencing. The transition vs. transversion error bias in cleaned UDPS data will influence the detection limits of rare mutations and sequence variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.