Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23894489›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Evaluation of a model for glycemic prediction in critically ill surgical patients.

Scott M Pappada, Brent D Cameron, David B Tulman, Raymond E Bourey, Marilyn J Borst, William Olorunto, Sergio D Bergese, David C Evans, Stanislaw P A Stawicki, Thomas J Papadimos

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04015388 (Development of a Comprehensive Clinical Decision Support System and Educational Tool to Support Optimization of Glycemic Control in the Hospital and Critical Care Setting), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04015388 completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Development of a Comprehensive Clinical Decision Support System and Educational Tool to Support Optimization of Glycemic Control in the Hospital and Critical Care Setting

TypeobservationalSponsorOhio State UniversityRan2014 to 2021Enrolled127ConditionsHyperglycemia, Diabetes MellitusArmsiPro Continuous Glucose Monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Scott M PappadaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States of America.
Brent D Cameron
David B Tulman
Raymond E Bourey
Marilyn J Borst
William Olorunto
Sergio D Bergese
David C Evans
Stanislaw P A Stawicki
Thomas J Papadimos

Funding

Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mehboob A Hussain · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated a neural network model for prediction of glucose in critically ill trauma and post-operative cardiothoracic surgical patients. A prospective, feasibility trial evaluating a continuous glucose-monitoring device was performed. After institutional review board approval, clinical data from all consenting surgical intensive care unit patients were converted to an electronic format using novel software. This data was utilized to develop and train a neural network model for real-time prediction of serum glucose concentration implementing a prediction horizon of 75 minutes. Glycemic data from 19 patients were used to "train" the neural network model. Subsequent real-time simulated testing was performed in 5 patients to whom the neural network model was naive. Performance of the model was evaluated by calculating the mean absolute difference percent (MAD%), Clarke Error Grid Analysis, and calculation of the percent of hypoglycemic (≤70 mg/dL), normoglycemic (>70 and <150 mg/dL), and hyperglycemic (≥150 mg/dL) values accurately predicted by the model; 9,405 data points were analyzed. The models successfully predicted trends in glucose in the 5 test patients. Clark Error Grid Analysis indicated that 100.0% of predictions were clinically acceptable with 87.3% and 12.7% of predicted values falling within regions A and B of the error grid respectively. Overall model error (MAD%) was 9.0% with respect to actual continuous glucose modeling data. Our model successfully predicted 96.7% and 53.6% of the normo- and hyperglycemic values respectively. No hypoglycemic events occurred in these patients. Use of neural network models for real-time prediction of glucose in the surgical intensive care unit setting offers healthcare providers potentially useful information which could facilitate optimization of glycemic control, patient safety, and improved care. Similar models can be implemented across a wider scale of biomedical variables to offer real-time optimization, training, and adaptation that increase predictive accuracy and performance of therapies.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseCritical IllnessNeural Networks, ComputerAdultAgedAged, 80 and overComputer SimulationFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodPrognosisSoftwareBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID23894489
PMCPMC3716648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.