Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23894364›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Magnetic nanoparticles as mediators of ligand-free activation of EGFR signaling.

Atul A Bharde, Raghavendra Palankar, Cornelia Fritsch, Arjen Klaver, Johannes S Kanger, Thomas M Jovin, Donna J Arndt-Jovin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Precise Regulation of Membrane Proteins: From Physical Technology to Biomolecular Strategy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cellular and Molecular Effects of Magnetic Fields.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Nanoparticles for Interrogation of Cell Signaling.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Effects of Fullerenol Nanoparticles on Rat Oocyte Meiosis Resumption.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Novel delivery approaches for cancer therapeutics.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Atul A BhardeLaboratory of Cellular Dynamics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.
Raghavendra Palankar
Cornelia Fritsch
Arjen Klaver
Johannes S Kanger
Thomas M Jovin
Donna J Arndt-Jovin
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry · DEMax Planck Society · DEUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnetic nanoparticles (NPs) are of particular interest in biomedical research, and have been exploited for molecular separation, gene/drug delivery, magnetic resonance imaging, and hyperthermic cancer therapy. In the case of cultured cells, magnetic manipulation of NPs provides the means for studying processes induced by mechanotransduction or by local clustering of targeted macromolecules, e.g. cell surface receptors. The latter are normally activated by binding of their natural ligands mediating key signaling pathways such as those associated with the epidermal growth factor (EGFR). However, it has been reported that EGFR may be dimerized and activated even in the absence of ligands. The present study assessed whether receptor clustering induced by physical means alone suffices for activating EGFR in quiescent cells. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThe EGFR on A431 cells was specifically targeted by superparamagnetic iron oxide NPs (SPIONs) carrying either a ligand-blocking monoclonal anti-EGFR antibody or a streptavidin molecule for targeting a chimeric EGFR incorporating a biotinylated amino-terminal acyl carrier peptide moiety. Application of a magnetic field led to SPION magnetization and clustering, resulting in activation of the EGFR, a process manifested by auto and transphosphorylation and downstream signaling. The magnetically-induced early signaling events were similar to those inherent to the ligand dependent EGFR pathways. Magnetization studies indicated that the NPs exerted magnetic dipolar forces in the sub-piconewton range with clustering dependent on Brownian motion of the receptor-SPION complex and magnetic field strength. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We demonstrate that EGFR on the cell surface that have their ligand binding-pocket blocked by an antibody are still capable of transphosphorylation and initiation of signaling cascades if they are clustered by SPIONs either attached locally or targeted to another site of the receptor ectodomain. The results suggest that activation of growth factor receptors may be triggered by ligand-independent molecular crowding resulting from overexpression and/or sequestration in membrane microdomains.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularAntibodies, MonoclonalCell Line, TumorErbB ReceptorsFerric CompoundsHumansLigandsMagneticsMembrane MicrodomainsNanoparticlesPhosphorylationAntibodies, MonoclonalErbB ReceptorsFerric Compoundsferric oxideLigands

Identifiers

PMID23894364
PMCPMC3720882
OpenAlexW2054614096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.