Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23894306›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Proteogenomic analysis of a thermophilic bacterial consortium adapted to deconstruct switchgrass.

Patrik D'haeseleer, John M Gladden, Martin Allgaier, Patrik S G Chain, Susannah G Tringe, Stephanie A Malfatti, Joshua T Aldrich, Carrie D Nicora, Errol W Robinson, Ljiljana Paša-Tolić and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effects ofGenes · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Deconstruction of Lignin: From Enzymes to Microorganisms.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Engineering glycoside hydrolase stability by the introduction of zinc binding.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Patrik D'haeseleerJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, United States of America. patrikd@llnl.gov
John M Gladden
Martin Allgaier
Patrik S G Chain
Susannah G Tringe
Stephanie A Malfatti
Joshua T Aldrich
Carrie D Nicora
Errol W Robinson
Ljiljana Paša-Tolić
Philip Hugenholtz
Blake A Simmons
Steven W Singer
Joint Genome Institute · USEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory · USLawrence Livermore National Laboratory · USJoint BioEnergy Institute · USLos Alamos National Laboratory · USPacific Northwest National Laboratory · USSandia National Laboratories California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thermophilic bacteria are a potential source of enzymes for the deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass. However, the complement of proteins used to deconstruct biomass and the specific roles of different microbial groups in thermophilic biomass deconstruction are not well-explored. Here we report on the metagenomic and proteogenomic analyses of a compost-derived bacterial consortium adapted to switchgrass at elevated temperature with high levels of glycoside hydrolase activities. Near-complete genomes were reconstructed for the most abundant populations, which included composite genomes for populations closely related to sequenced strains of Thermus thermophilus and Rhodothermus marinus, and for novel populations that are related to thermophilic Paenibacilli and an uncultivated subdivision of the little-studied Gemmatimonadetes phylum. Partial genomes were also reconstructed for a number of lower abundance thermophilic Chloroflexi populations. Identification of genes for lignocellulose processing and metabolic reconstructions suggested Rhodothermus, Paenibacillus and Gemmatimonadetes as key groups for deconstructing biomass, and Thermus as a group that may primarily metabolize low molecular weight compounds. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of the consortium was used to identify >3000 proteins in fractionated samples from the cultures, and confirmed the importance of Paenibacillus and Gemmatimonadetes to biomass deconstruction. These studies also indicate that there are unexplored proteins with important roles in bacterial lignocellulose deconstruction.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalBacteriaBase CompositionBiomassCarbohydrate MetabolismGenomicsLigninMetabolomicsMetagenomicsMolecular Sequence AnnotationPanicumPhylogenyProteomicsRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SLigninlignocelluloseRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID23894306
PMCPMC3716776
OpenAlexW2094461093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.