Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23894268›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2013

Efficacy of muscle exercise in patients with muscular dystrophy: a systematic review showing a missed opportunity to improve outcomes.

Silvia Gianola, Valentina Pecoraro, Simone Lambiase, Roberto Gatti, Giuseppe Banfi, Lorenzo Moja

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy: A Patients' Perspective.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2021
    Article
  13. Management of motor rehabilitation in individuals with muscular dystrophies. 1Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2021
    Article
  14. Beneficial Role of Exercise in the Modulation ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Exercise in neuromuscular disorders: a promising intervention.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Physical exertion exacerbates decline in the musculature of an animal model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia GianolaClinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Milan, Italy. silvia.gianola@gmail.com
Valentina Pecoraro
Simone Lambiase
Roberto Gatti
Giuseppe Banfi
Lorenzo Moja
Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Milan · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough muscular dystrophy causes muscle weakness and muscle loss, the role of exercise in the management of this disease remains controversial.

objectiveThe purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the role of exercise interventions on muscle strength in patients with muscular dystrophy.

methodsWe performed systematic electronic searches in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and Pedro as well as a list of reference literature. We included trials assessing muscle exercise in patients with muscular dystrophy. Two reviewers independently abstracted data and appraised risk of bias.

resultsWe identified five small (two controlled and three randomized clinical) trials comprising 242 patients and two ongoing randomized controlled trials. We were able to perform two meta-analyses. We found an absence of evidence for a difference in muscle strength (MD 4.18, 95% CIs - 2.03 to 10.39; p = 0.91) and in endurance (MD -0.53, 95% CIs -1.11 to 0.05; p = 0.26). In both, the direction of effects favored muscle exercise.

conclusionsThe first included trial about the efficacy of muscular exercise was published in 1978. Even though some benefits of muscle exercise were consistently reported across studies, the benefits might be due to the small size of studies and other biases. Detrimental effects are still possible. After several decades of research, doctors cannot give advice and patients are, thus, denied basic information. A multi-center randomized trial investigating the strength of muscles, fatigue, and functional limitations is needed.

Indexed as

ExerciseHumansMuscle StrengthMuscular DystrophiesQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID23894268
PMCPMC3680476
OpenAlexW2086884126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.