Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23893429›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience bulletin2013

Animal models of axon regeneration after spinal cord injury.

Do-Hun Lee, Jae K Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience bulletin, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Functional recovery induced by KCC2-enabled relay pathways in completely injured spinal cords in adult rats.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Macrophage Transcriptional Profile Identifies Lipid Catabolic Pathways That Can Be Therapeutically Targeted after Spinal Cord Injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. A Combination ofFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Do-Hun LeeMiami Project to Cure Paralysis, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Jae K Lee

Funding

Targeting Lipid Clearance Pathways to Promote Repair After SCIR01NS081040 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Jae K Lee · 2012 to 2026
$5.3M
Translational Profile of Perivascular Fibroblasts after Spinal Cord InjuryR21NS082835 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LEE, JAE K · 2013 to 2014
$420k
NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS081040-01NINDS NIH HHS 1R21NS082835-01NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS081040NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS082835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With advances in genetic and imaging techniques, investigating axon regeneration after spinal cord injury in vivo is becoming more common in the literature. However, there are many issues to consider when using animal models of axon regeneration, including species, strains and injury models. No single particular model suits all types of experiments and each hypothesis being tested requires careful selection of the appropriate animal model. in this review, we describe several commonly-used animal models of axon regeneration in the spinal cord and discuss their advantages and disadvantages.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsAxonsNerve RegenerationSpinal Cord Injuries

Identifiers

PMID23893429
PMCPMC3920733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.