Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23893102›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2013

The cell cycle of archaea.

Ann-Christin Lindås, Rolf Bernander

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Journal of bacteriology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Regulation of eukaryotic-like cell cycle progression in archaea is coming into focus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An alternative resource allocation strategy in the chemolithoautotrophic archaeonProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Virus-induced cell gigantism and asymmetric cell division in archaea.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The merger that made us.BMC biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ann-Christin LindåsDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 20C, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rolf Bernander
Stockholm University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growth and proliferation of all cell types require intricate regulation and coordination of chromosome replication, genome segregation, cell division and the systems that determine cell shape. Recent findings have provided insight into the cell cycle of archaea, including the multiple-origin mode of DNA replication, the initial characterization of a genome segregation machinery and the discovery of a novel cell division system. The first archaeal cytoskeletal protein, crenactin, was also recently described and shown to function in cell shape determination. Here, we outline the current understanding of the archaeal cell cycle and cytoskeleton, with an emphasis on species in the genus Sulfolobus, and consider the major outstanding questions in the field.

Indexed as

ArchaeaCell CycleCell DivisionChromosomes, Archaeal

Identifiers

PMID23893102
OpenAlexW1976577540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.