ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2013
Few-view single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) reconstruction based on a blurred piecewise constant object model.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graph-Enhanced Expectation Maximization for Emission Tomography.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Hyperparameter-controlled regularized reconstruction method based on object structure and acquisition conditions in SPECT.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Investigation of a deep learning-based reconstruction approach utilizing dual-view projection for myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Simultaneous Activity and Attenuation Estimation in TOF-PET With TV-Constrained Nonconvex Optimization.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2024Article
- Simultaneous activity and attenuation estimation in TOF-PET with TV-constrained nonconvex optimization.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Biodistribution and dosimetry for combined [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- SPECT reconstruction with a trained regularizer using CT-side information: Application toIEEE transactions on computational imaging · 2023Article
- Do CNNs Solve the CT Inverse Problem?IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2021Article
- Virtual clinical trials in medical imaging: a review.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2020Review
- Optimization-Based Image Reconstruction From Low-Count, List-Mode TOF-PET Data.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2018Article
- Investigation of optimization-based reconstruction with an image-total-variation constraint in PET.Physics in medicine and biology · 2016Article
- On Few-View Tomography and Staircase Artifacts.IEEE transactions on nuclear science · 2015Article
- An Efficient Augmented Lagrangian Method for Statistical X-Ray CT Image Reconstruction.PloS one · 2015Article
- Sparse-view x-ray CT reconstruction via total generalized variation regularization.Physics in medicine and biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A sparsity-exploiting algorithm intended for few-view single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) reconstruction is proposed and characterized. The algorithm models the object as piecewise constant subject to a blurring operation. To validate that the algorithm closely approximates the true object in the noiseless case, projection data were generated from an object assuming this model and using the system matrix. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to provide more realistic data of a phantom with varying smoothness across the field of view and a cardiac phantom. Reconstructions were performed across a sweep of two primary design parameters. The results demonstrate that the algorithm recovers the object in a noiseless simulation case. While the algorithm assumes a specific blurring model, the results suggest that the algorithm may provide high reconstruction accuracy even when the object does not match the assumed blurring model. Generally, increased values of the blurring parameter and total variation weighting parameters reduced streaking artifacts, while decreasing spatial resolution. The proposed algorithm demonstrated higher correlation with respect to the true phantom compared to maximum-likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) reconstructions. Images reconstructed with the proposed algorithm demonstrated reduced streaking artifacts when reconstructing from few views compared to MLEM. The proposed algorithm introduced patchy artifacts in some reconstructed images, depending on the noise level and the selected algorithm parameters. Overall, the results demonstrate preliminary feasibility of a sparsity-exploiting reconstruction algorithm which may be beneficial for few-view SPECT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.