Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23892761›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2013

Comparison of probe-based confocal endomicroscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy and white-light endoscopy for diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia.

Lee Guan Lim, Khay Guan Yeoh, Supriya Srivastava, Yiong Huak Chan, Ming Teh, Khek Yu Ho

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Advanced endoscopic methods in gastrointestinal diseases: a systematic review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for Diagnosing Malignant Pleural Effusions.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lee Guan LimDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Health System, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore, 119260, Singapore, lee_guan_lim@nuhs.edu.sg.
Khay Guan Yeoh
Supriya Srivastava
Yiong Huak Chan
Ming Teh
Khek Yu Ho
National University of Singapore · SGNational University Health System · SGNational University Cancer Institute, Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe prospectively compared the diagnostic performance of autofluorescence imaging (AFI), magnifying narrow band imaging (mNBI), and probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) with white light endoscopy (WLE) for the diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM), using histology as the "gold standard."

designChinese >50 years old with history of GIM were prospectively recruited. All subjects underwent WLE, followed by AFI and NBI, and finally pCLE. Patients were randomized to undergo either AFI before NBI or vice versa. In each patient, a minimum of six sites (antrum lesser and greater curve, body lesser and greater curve, incisura, cardia, and any lesion) were each examined by WLE, AFI, NBI, and pCLE. The diagnoses were made real-time. Biopsies for histology were taken from all examined sites. pCLE videos also were reviewed off-site. Analysis was performed per-site.

resultsA total of 125 sites in 20 patients were examined. For diagnosing GIM, real-time pCLE had better sensitivity (90.9 vs. 37.9%, p < 0.001) and accuracy (88.0 vs. 64.8%, p < 0.001) compared with WLE. Sensitivity (90.9 vs. 68.2%, p = 0.001), specificity (84.7 vs. 69.5%, p = 0.042), and accuracy (88 vs. 68.8%, p < 0.001) of real-time pCLE were better than AFI. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of real-time pCLE and mNBI for diagnosing GIM were similar. Off-site pCLE had significantly better accuracy for diagnosing GIM compared to WLE, AFI, and mNBI. Off-site pCLE had superior specificity (94.9 vs. 84.7%, p = 0.031) and accuracy (95.2 vs. 88.0%, p = 0.012) compared with real-time pCLE.

conclusionspCLE was superior to AFI and WLE for diagnosing GIM. Off-site review improved performance of pCLE.

Indexed as

BiopsyDiagnosis, DifferentialEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleGastric MucosaHumansMaleMetaplasiaMicroscopy, ConfocalMiddle AgedNarrow Band ImagingProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveStomach NeoplasmsVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID23892761
OpenAlexW2064463015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.