ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2013
Why do some patients prefer to leave decisions up to the doctor: lack of self-efficacy or a matter of trust?
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sexism Interacts with Patient-Physician Gender Concordance in Influencing Patient Control Preferences: Findings from a Vignette Experimental Design.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Decision-Making preferences in advanced cancer patients: associations with sociodemographic and psychological factors.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- The impact of health literacy on treatment adherence in COPD patients: chain mediation roles of self-efficacy and perceived disease threat.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Information transparency with immediate release: Oncology clinician and patient perceptions.American journal of surgery · 2024Article
- Decision making in the oesophageal cancer trajectory a source of tension and edginess to patients and relatives: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023Article
- Self-efficacy of advanced cancer patients for participation in treatment-related decision-making in six European countries: the ACTION study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- Couples coping with advanced prostate cancer: an explorative study on decision-making preferences, self-efficacy and fear of progression.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Patients' experiences with an audio-visual intervention, the use of a tailored explanimation video in patients with bladder cancer.PEC innovation · 2022Article
- Care planning priorities of older patients with advanced bladder cancer.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2022Article
- Computer-Based Decision Tools for Shared Therapeutic Decision-making in Oncology: Systematic Review.JMIR cancer · 2021Review
- Shared decision making in high-grade glioma patients-a systematic review.Neuro-oncology practice · 2020Review
- Colour Coding Navigation: "Triage" Techniques to Improve Compliance in Breast Cancer Patients Requiring Primary Chemotherapy.European journal of breast health · 2020Article
- Patient engagement with antibiotic messaging in secondary care: a qualitative feasibility study of the 'review and revise' experience.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2020Article
- Preferred problem solving and decision-making role in fertility treatment among women following an unsuccessful in vitro fertilization cycle.BMC women's health · 2019Article
- Feeling Respected as a Person: a Qualitative Analysis of Frail Older People's Experiences on an Acute Geriatric Ward Practicing a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: role of health literacy and shared decision-making.Patient preference and adherence · 2019Article
- The decision-making process for unplanned admission to hospital unveiled in hospitalised older adults: a qualitative study.BMC geriatrics · 2018Article
- The Female Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship Scale: A validation study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDecision-making preferences among cancer survivors during their follow-up care remains understudied and limited research examines factors that underlie these preferences. The purpose of this study was to assess cancer patients' decision-making preferences during follow-up care, the role of trust and self-efficacy, and the effect of preferences on health outcomes.
methodsSix hundred twenty-three bladder, leukemia, and colorectal cancer survivors were recruited to the Assessment of Patient Experiences of Cancer Care study between April 2003 and November 2004. Respondents were asked about their follow-up care experiences, including decision-making preferences, trust in physicians, self-efficacy, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and health appraisal. Unadjusted mean scores of trust and self-efficacy measures by decision preference group were examined. Multinomial logistic and linear regressions were conducted to examine predictors of decision-making preferences and the impact of decision-making preferences on HRQOL and health appraisal.
resultsWhile the majority of patients preferred shared decision-making (61.0 %), 16.1 % preferred to control their decisions and 22.1 % preferred physician control over decisions. Compared to the other groups, patients preferring physician control had greater trust in their physician (p < 0.001), similar self-efficacy for engaging in the decision-making process, and lower self-efficacy for taking responsibility over decisions (p < 0.001). There were no notable differences between decision-making groups on outcome measures.
conclusionPatients who prefer physicians to control decisions are as confident about participating in the decision-making process and experience similar health outcomes as those preferring greater decisional control. Physicians need to tailor their communication behavior to encourage participation and trust among all patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Findings from this study provide unique insights into the decision-making preferences of cancer patients during receipt of follow-up care, which remains an understudied phase of cancer care delivery. Results underscore the need for approaches to decision-making and patient engagement to become more nuanced and to encourage patients to participate in decision-making in ways they are most comfortable. Furthermore, physicians and health care professionals should foster environments that promote trust and clear communication regardless of patient decision-making styles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.