ArticleParasitology research2013
Molecular typing of Giardia duodenalis isolates from German travellers.
Article in Parasitology research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global prevalence of Giardia infection in nonhuman mammalian hosts: A systematic review and meta-analysis of five million animals.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of multilocus genotyping and a commercial beta-giardin qPCR assay for detection of Giardia duodenalis zoonotic assemblages in cat and dog samples.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Prevalence and assemblage distribution ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Intestinal protozoa in returning travellers: a GeoSentinel analysis from 2007 to 2019.Journal of travel medicine · 2024Article
- Examining the molecular epidemiology of Giardia and Eimeria species in Japan: a comprehensive review.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2024Review
- Host-specificParasitology · 2024Article
- Molecular characterization and zoonotic potential of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in humans and domestic animals in Heilongjiang Province, China.Parasites & vectors · 2024Article
- The Gut-Wrenching Effects of Cryptosporidiosis and Giardiasis in Children.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Gastrointestinal parasites in young dogs and risk factors associated with infection.Parasitology research · 2023Article
- Review
- Frequency and genotyping ofVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2023Article
- Prevalence and genetic diversity ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Giardia duodenalis in patients with diarrhea and various animals in northeastern China: prevalence and multilocus genetic characterization.Parasites & vectors · 2022Article
- Multilocus sequence typing ofFrontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Zoonotic giardiasis: an update.Parasitology research · 2021Review
- Suitability of current typing procedures to identify epidemiologically linked human Giardia duodenalis isolates.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Molecular epidemiology ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2021Article
- Wildlife Is a Potential Source of Human Infections ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Potential Risk of Three Zoonotic Protozoa (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Assessment of next generation amplicon sequencing of the beta-giardin gene for the detection ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Giardia duodenalis isolates from German travellers returning from tropical areas were characterised by PCR amplification and sequencing of fragments of the beta-giardin (bg), glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh) and triose phosphate isomerase (tpi) genes. Assignment of isolates to specific G. duodenalis assemblages was found to differ according to the marker used. Indeed, at the bg locus, assemblages A and B were identified, with a higher prevalence of the former over the latter, whereas at the tpi and gdh loci, most samples were classified as assemblage B. In agreement with previous studies, sequence analysis showed that assemblage B isolates have a higher genetic polymorphism than assemblage A isolates, and novel variants were described. The degree of polymorphism was shown in a graphical representation of the polymorphic sites generating a novel sequence, the heterogeneous positions common to assemblages A and B (double peaks), that may represent mixed assemblage infection and the heterogeneous positions detected at random sites. Notably, assemblage D, which is considered to be adapted to dogs, was found at the gdh locus in two samples originating from southern Asia, as novel genotypes. By comparing the geographical origin of the infected cases and the number of German travellers visiting the areas considered, India and west Africa appeared to be the areas associated to the highest risk of acquiring Giardia infection. The analysis of the geographical distribution of the genotypes did not suggest any particular geographical clustering pattern, but it may be useful to evaluate these results with a higher number of isolates. Most of the samples typed at the three markers could not be assigned unequivocally to either assemblage A or B, and this was confirmed also by a real-time PCR assay, using a set of assemblage-specific primers. The results of this study reinforce the notion that genetic exchanges and allelic sequence heterogeneity represent major obstacles towards understanding the epidemiology of giardiasis and that exposure to Giardia parasites in endemic areas often results in mixed infections in returning travellers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.