Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23891987›Full record

ArticleNanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine2014

Nanoscale artificial antigen presenting cells for T cell immunotherapy.

Karlo Perica, Andrés De León Medero, Malarvizhi Durai, Yen Ling Chiu, Joan Glick Bieler, Leah Sibener, Michaela Niemöller, Mario Assenmacher, Anne Richter, Michael Edidin and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. New Types of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Stimuli-Responsive Theranostic Nanoplatforms.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Antigen Delivery Systems: Past, Present, and Future.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Analysis of Antibody Induction by Macrophages TreatedReports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karlo PericaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Departments of Pathology, Oncology, and Medicine. Institute of Cell Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Andrés De León MederoDepartments of Pathology, Oncology, and Medicine. Institute of Cell Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Malarvizhi DuraiDepartments of Pathology, Oncology, and Medicine. Institute of Cell Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yen Ling ChiuDepartments of Pathology, Oncology, and Medicine. Institute of Cell Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Joan Glick BielerDepartments of Pathology, Oncology, and Medicine. Institute of Cell Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Leah SibenerDepartments of Pathology, Oncology, and Medicine. Institute of Cell Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michaela NiemöllerMiltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany.
Mario AssenmacherMiltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany.
Anne RichterMiltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany.
Michael EdidinDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mathias OelkeDepartments of Pathology, Oncology, and Medicine. Institute of Cell Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jonathan SchneckDepartments of Pathology, Oncology, and Medicine. Institute of Cell Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: jschnec1@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USMiltenyi Biotec (Germany) · DE

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007309 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COX, ANDREA L · 1985 to 2019
$43.2M
The influence of TCR spatial organization on the T cell responsesP01AI072677 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHNECK, JONATHAN P · 2008 to 2012
$10.3M
CELLULAR &MOLECULAR MECH OF INFLAMMATORY REACTIONST32AI007247 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Joel L Pomerantz · 1985 to 2026
$10.2M
Use of aAPC for Melanoma Adoptive ImmunotherapyR01CA108835 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHNECK, JONATHAN P · 2004 to 2015
$3.3M
ANTIGEN SPECIFIC MODULATION OF T CELL RESPONSESR01AI044129 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHNECK, JONATHAN P · 1999 to 2009
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA108835NCI NIH HHS R01-CA108835NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI072677NIAID NIH HHS P01-AI072677NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI044129NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI44129NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007247NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial antigen presenting cells (aAPC), which deliver stimulatory signals to cytotoxic lymphocytes, are a powerful tool for both adoptive and active immunotherapy. Thus far, aAPC have been synthesized by coupling T cell activating proteins such as CD3 or MHC-peptide to micron-sized beads. Nanoscale platforms have different trafficking and biophysical interaction properties and may allow development of new immunotherapeutic strategies. We therefore manufactured aAPC based on two types of nanoscale particle platforms: biocompatible iron-dextran paramagnetic particles (50-100 nm in diameter) and avidin-coated quantum dot nanocrystals (~30 nm). Nanoscale aAPC induced antigen-specific T cell proliferation from mouse splenocytes and human peripheral blood T cells. When injected in vivo, both iron-dextran particles and quantum dot nanocrystals enhanced tumor rejection in a subcutaneous mouse melanoma model. This is the first description of nanoscale aAPC that induce antigen-specific T cell proliferation in vitro and lead to effective T cell stimulation and inhibition of tumor growth in vivo. FROM THE CLINICAL EDITOR: Artifical antigen presenting cells could revolutionize the field of cancer-directed immunotherapy. This team of investigators have manufactured two types of nanoscale particle platform-based aAPCs and demonstrates that both iron-dextran particles and quantum dot nanocrystals enhance tumor rejection in a melanoma model, providing the first description of nanoscale aAPCs that lead to effective T cell stimulation and inhibition of tumor growth.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAnimalsAntigen-Presenting CellsAntigens, NeoplasmCell ProliferationHumansIron-Dextran ComplexMelanomaMiceNanoparticlesQuantum DotsT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicAntigens, NeoplasmIron-Dextran ComplexArtificial antigen presenting cellImmunotherapyNanoparticleT cell

Identifiers

PMID23891987
PMCPMC4114774
OpenAlexW1966529586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.