Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23891460›Full record

Trial reportJournal of substance abuse treatment

A randomized trial comparing telephone versus in-person brief intervention to reduce the risk of an alcohol-exposed pregnancy.

Georgiana Wilton, D Paul Moberg, Kit R Van Stelle, Lyric L Dold, Kristi Obmascher, Janae Goodrich

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of substance abuse treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Substance use during pregnancy.F1000Research · 2016
    Review
  17. Substance Use in the Perinatal Period.Current psychiatry reports · 2015
    Review
  18. The national alcohol helpline in Sweden: an evaluation of its first year.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Georgiana WiltonUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health. Electronic address: georgiana.wilton@fammed.wisc.edu.
D Paul Moberg
Kit R Van Stelle
Lyric L Dold
Kristi Obmascher
Janae Goodrich

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
NCATS NIH HHS 9U54TR000021NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011PHS HHS U84/CCU524082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brief, effective interventions are needed to reduce the risk of an alcohol-exposed pregnancy in women who drink and do not use effective contraception. The Healthy Choices study compared telephone and in-person administration of a brief intervention. In addition to indicators of alcohol use and effective contraception, compliance with the intervention was examined. Women between the ages of 18 and 44 who were drinking above recommended levels and not using effective contraception were randomly assigned to either a telephone (n=68) or in-person (n=63) brief (two sessions) intervention. Overall, participants showed small but significant reductions in alcohol use and larger increases in effective use of contraception. Risk of alcohol-exposed pregnancy was thus significantly reduced, largely due to improved contraception with minor reductions in alcohol use. There was no significant difference in success of the intervention between the two conditions (telephone versus in-person). These findings suggest telephone-based brief intervention may be equally successful and cost-effective in reducing the risk of an alcohol-exposed pregnancy and thus fetal alcohol syndrome.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAlcohol DrinkingContraceptionCost-Benefit AnalysisEthanolFemaleFetal Alcohol Spectrum DisordersFollow-Up StudiesHumansPatient CompliancePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPsychotherapy, BriefRiskTelephoneEthanolAlcoholBrief interventionFetal alcohol syndromePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID23891460
PMCPMC4055081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.