ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013
Surface feature based classification of plant organs from 3D laserscanned point clouds for plant phenotyping.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D reconstruction analysis of maize-soybean intercropping competition under water stress.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Advancements in 3D field-crop phenotyping using point clouds: a comparative review of sensor technology, target traits, and challenges under controlled and field conditions.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- HALF: Histogram of Angles in Linked Features for 3D Point Cloud Data Segmentation of Plants for Robust Sensing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A 3D printed plant model for accurate and reliable 3D plant phenotyping.GigaScience · 2024Article
- How to make sense of 3D representations for plant phenotyping: a compendium of processing and analysis techniques.Plant methods · 2023Review
- Cotton plant part 3D segmentation and architectural trait extraction using point voxel convolutional neural networks.Plant methods · 2023Article
- "Canopy fingerprints" for characterizing three-dimensional point cloud data of soybean canopies.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- DFSP: A fast and automatic distance field-based stem-leaf segmentation pipeline for point cloud of maize shoot.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Proximal and remote sensing in plant phenomics: 20 years of progress, challenges, and perspectives.Plant communications · 2022Review
- Segmentation of structural parts of rosebush plants with 3D point-based deep learning methods.Plant methods · 2022Article
- A graph-based approach for simultaneous semantic and instance segmentation of plant 3D point clouds.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Method of Rapeseed Plants in the Whole Growth Period Using RGB-D Camera.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Parametric Surface Modelling for Tea Leaf Point Cloud Based on Non-Uniform Rational Basis Spline Technique.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Optimization of 3D Point Clouds of Oilseed Rape Plants Based on Time-of-Flight Cameras.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Pheno4D: A spatio-temporal dataset of maize and tomato plant point clouds for phenotyping and advanced plant analysis.PloS one · 2021Article
- Deep Segmentation of Point Clouds of Wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Article
- Statistical shape analysis of tap roots: a methodological case study on laser scanned sugar beets.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Non-Destructive Measurement of Three-Dimensional Plants Based on Point Cloud.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaserscanning recently has become a powerful and common method for plant parameterization and plant growth observation on nearly every scale range. However, 3D measurements with high accuracy, spatial resolution and speed result in a multitude of points that require processing and analysis. The primary objective of this research has been to establish a reliable and fast technique for high throughput phenotyping using differentiation, segmentation and classification of single plants by a fully automated system. In this report, we introduce a technique for automated classification of point clouds of plants and present the applicability for plant parameterization.
resultsA surface feature histogram based approach from the field of robotics was adapted to close-up laserscans of plants. Local geometric point features describe class characteristics, which were used to distinguish among different plant organs. This approach has been proven and tested on several plant species. Grapevine stems and leaves were classified with an accuracy of up to 98%. The proposed method was successfully transferred to 3D-laserscans of wheat plants for yield estimation. Wheat ears were separated with an accuracy of 96% from other plant organs. Subsequently, the ear volume was calculated and correlated to the ear weight, the kernel weights and the number of kernels. Furthermore the impact of the data resolution was evaluated considering point to point distances between 0.3 and 4.0 mm with respect to the classification accuracy.
conclusionWe introduced an approach using surface feature histograms for automated plant organ parameterization. Highly reliable classification results of about 96% for the separation of grapevine and wheat organs have been obtained. This approach was found to be independent of the point to point distance and applicable to multiple plant species. Its reliability, flexibility and its high order of automation make this method well suited for the demands of high throughput phenotyping. HIGHLIGHTS: • Automatic classification of plant organs using geometrical surface information• Transfer of analysis methods for low resolution point clouds to close-up laser measurements of plants• Analysis of 3D-data requirements for automated plant organ classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.