Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23890237›Full record

ReviewThe Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice2013

Feline drug metabolism and disposition: pharmacokinetic evidence for species differences and molecular mechanisms.

Michael H Court

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous and Subcutaneous Ondansetron in Female Beagle Dogs.Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael H CourtDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA. Michael.Court@vetmed.wsu.edu
Washington State University · US

Funding

MOLECULAR DETERMINANTS OF UGT FUNCTIONR01GM061834 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI COURT, MICHAEL H · 2000 to 2010
$2.4M
MicroRNAs as effectors of variable human drug metabolismR01GM102130 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI COURT, MICHAEL H · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061834NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it is widely appreciated that cats respond differently to certain drugs compared with other companion animal species, the causes of these differences are poorly understood. This article evaluates published evidence for altered drug effects in cats, focusing on pharmacokinetic differences between cats, dogs, and humans, and the molecular mechanisms underlying these differences. More work is needed to better understand drug metabolism and disposition differences in cats, thereby enabling more rational prescribing of existing medications, and the development of safer drugs for this species.

Indexed as

PharmacokineticsAnimalsCat DiseasesCatsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsSpecies SpecificityCatGlucuronidationPharmacokineticsSpecies differences

Identifiers

PMID23890237
PMCPMC3811070
OpenAlexW2120562372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.