Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23889883›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2013

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index.

Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas, Philip C Gabel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05997797 (Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Reliability of Urdu Version of The Foot and Ankle Ability Measures), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05997797 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Reliability of Urdu Version of The Foot and Ankle Ability Measures (FAAM-U)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of LahoreRan2022 to 2022Enrolled175ConditionsFoot Injuries, Ankle InjuriesArmsFAAM
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index on Breast Cancer Survivor.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Implementation of a Standard Care Program of Therapeutic Exercise in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Design and implementation of a standard care programme of therapeutic exercise and education for breast cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Philip C Gabel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is an internationally widely used outcome measure with robust, valid psychometric properties. The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp).

methodsA two stage observational study was conducted. The ULFI was cross-culturally adapted to Spanish through double forward and backward translations, the psychometric properties were then validated. Participants (n = 126) with various upper limb conditions of >12 weeks duration completed the ULFI-Sp, QuickDASH and the Euroqol Health Questionnaire 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-3 L). The full sample determined internal consistency, concurrent criterion validity, construct validity and factor structure; a subgroup (n = 35) determined reliability at seven days.

resultsThe ULFI-Sp demonstrated high internal consistency (α = 0.94) and reliability (r = 0.93). Factor structure was one-dimensional and supported construct validity. Criterion validity with the EQ-5D-3 L was fair and inversely correlated (r = -0.59). The QuickDASH data was unavailable for analysis due to excessive missing responses.

conclusionsThe ULFI-Sp is a valid upper limb outcome measure with similar psychometric properties to the English language version.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonHealth Status IndicatorsDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareProspective StudiesPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSpainSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslating

Identifiers

PMID23889883
PMCPMC3727948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.