ArticleSpringerPlus2013
Prediction of lung tumor types based on protein attributes by machine learning algorithms.
Article in SpringerPlus, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning driven dashboard for chronic myeloid leukemia prediction using protein sequences.PloS one · 2025Article
- Integration of machine learning models with microsatellite markers: New avenue in world grapevine germplasm characterization.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024Article
- Image processing unravels the evolutionary pattern of SARS-CoV-2 against SARS and MERS through position-based pattern recognition.Computers in biology and medicine · 2021Article
- Machine learning is a valid method for predicting prehospital delay after acute ischemic stroke.Brain and behavior · 2020Article
- Machine Learning Analysis of Image Data Based on Detailed MR Image Reports for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Prognosis.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- Accuracy Enhanced Lung Cancer Prognosis for Improving Patient Survivability Using Proposed Gaussian Classifier System.Journal of medical systems · 2019Article
- Lung cancer prediction from microarray data by gene expression programming.IET systems biology · 2016Article
- Exploiting machine learning for predicting skeletal-related events in cancer patients with bone metastases.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- A Highly Efficient Gene Expression Programming (GEP) Model for Auxiliary Diagnosis of Small Cell Lung Cancer.PloS one · 2015Article
- Article
- Prediction of hepatitis C virus interferon/ribavirin therapy outcome based on viral nucleotide attributes using machine learning algorithms.BMC research notes · 2014Article
- APPLYING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES IN DETECTING BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS.Proceedings. International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics · 2014Article
- Understanding the undelaying mechanism of HA-subtyping in the level of physic-chemical characteristics of protein.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early diagnosis of lung cancers and distinction between the tumor types (Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) are very important to increase the survival rate of patients. Herein, we propose a diagnostic system based on sequence-derived structural and physicochemical attributes of proteins that involved in both types of tumors via feature extraction, feature selection and prediction models. 1497 proteins attributes computed and important features selected by 12 attribute weighting models and finally machine learning models consist of seven SVM models, three ANN models and two NB models applied on original database and newly created ones from attribute weighting models; models accuracies calculated through 10-fold cross and wrapper validation (just for SVM algorithms). In line with our previous findings, dipeptide composition, autocorrelation and distribution descriptor were the most important protein features selected by bioinformatics tools. The algorithms performances in lung cancer tumor type prediction increased when they applied on datasets created by attribute weighting models rather than original dataset. Wrapper-Validation performed better than X-Validation; the best cancer type prediction resulted from SVM and SVM Linear models (82%). The best accuracy of ANN gained when Neural Net model applied on SVM dataset (88%). This is the first report suggesting that the combination of protein features and attribute weighting models with machine learning algorithms can be effectively used to predict the type of lung cancer tumors (SCLC and NSCLC).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.