Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23888203›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic reviews2013

A new treatment for hip osteoarthritis: clinical evidence for the efficacy of autologous conditioned serum.

Axel W A Baltzer, Martin S Ostapczuk, Daniel Stosch, Florian Seidel, Markus Granrath

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Neuroimmune modulation of pain and regenerative pain medicine.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Axel W A Baltzer
Martin S Ostapczuk
Daniel Stosch
Florian Seidel
Markus Granrath
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of intra-articular injections of autologous conditioned serum on human hip osteoarthritis and to test whether a potential treatment effect might be increased by additional injections of steroids and the recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein anakinra. We compared the effects of autologous conditioned serum 46 hip osteoarthritis patients), autologous conditioned serum+cortisone (56 patients), and autologous conditioned serum+cortisone+recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein (17 patients) in a retrospective clinical study by means of the Visual Analogue Scale for pain (pre- vs posttreatment). Over 14 months, treatment resulted in a large, statistically significant improvement for patients in all three groups, independent of the severity of osteoarthritis. Neither cortisone nor cortisone+recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein increased the beneficial treatment effect over and above the effect of autologous conditioned serum alone. Autologous conditioned serum successfully reduces pain in hip osteoarthritis. In severe hip osteoarthritis, the sole application of autologous conditioned serum can be even more beneficial than the combination of autologous conditioned serum with steroids.

Indexed as

autologous conditioned serumhip osteoarthritisrecombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist protein

Identifiers

PMID23888203
PMCPMC3718237
OpenAlexW2037656672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.