Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23887931›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2014

The evolution of an academic-community partnership in the design, implementation, and evaluation of experience corps® Baltimore city: a courtship model.

Erwin J Tan, Sylvia McGill, Elizabeth K Tanner, Michelle C Carlson, George W Rebok, Teresa E Seeman, Linda P Fried

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00380562 (Experience Corps Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00380562 nacompletednot on this map

Experience Corps Trial: Improving Health of Older Populations Through Generativity

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2006 to 2011Enrolled702ConditionsAging, GenerativityArmsExperience Corps
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of Experience Corps(®) participation on school climate.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2015
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erwin J Tan*Address correspondence to Erwin J. Tan, The Corporation for National and Community Service, Senior Corps, 1201 New York Ave NW, Washington, DC 20005. E-mail: erwin.tan.md@gmail.com.
Sylvia McGill
Elizabeth K Tanner
Michelle C Carlson
George W Rebok
Teresa E Seeman
Linda P Fried

Funding

Technological Assessment and Solutions Core - RC4P30AG021334 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jeremy D Walston · 2003 to 2026
$33.2M
SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL BENEFITS OF EXPERIENCE CORPS PARTICIPATIONP01AG027735 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI REBOK, GEORGE W. · 2006 to 2013
$10.9M
Pathogenesis of physical disability in Aging womenR37AG019905 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FRIED, LINDA P · 2001 to 2010
$9.0M
NIA NIH HHS 3P01AG027735-02S3NIA NIH HHS 3P01AG027735-03S2NIA NIH HHS P01 AG027735NIA NIH HHS P30-AG02133NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021334NIA NIH HHS R37-AG19905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExperience Corps Baltimore City (EC) is a product of a partnership between the Greater Homewood Community Corporation (GHCC) and the Johns Hopkins Center on Aging and Health (COAH) that began in 1998. EC recruits volunteers aged 55 and older into high-impact mentoring and tutoring roles in public elementary schools that are designed to also benefit the volunteers. We describe the evolution of the GHCC-COAH partnership through the "Courtship Model." DESIGN AND

methodsWe describe how community-based participatory research principals, such as shared governance, were applied at the following stages: (1) partner selection, (2) getting serious, (3) commitment, and (4) leaving a legacy.

resultsEC could not have achieved its current level of success without academic-community partnership. In early stages of the "Courtship Model," GHCC and COAH were able to rely on the trust developed between the leadership of the partner organizations. Competing missions from different community and academic funders led to tension in later stages of the "Courtship Model" and necessitated a formal Memorandum of Understanding between the partners as they embarked on a randomized controlled trial. IMPLICATIONS: The GHCC-COAH partnership demonstrates how academic-community partnerships can serve as an engine for social innovation. The partnership could serve as a model for other communities seeking multiple funding sources to implement similar public health interventions that are based on national service models. Unified funding mechanisms would assist the formation of academic-community partnerships that could support the design, implementation, and the evaluation of community-based public health interventions.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsHealth PromotionModels, TheoreticalProgram EvaluationPublic HealthAgedBaltimoreCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCooperative BehaviorCourtshipHumansVolunteersCommunity-Based participatory researchCommunity-Institutional relationsIntergenerational relationsOrganization and administrationRandomized controlled trials as topicVolunteerism

Identifiers

PMID23887931
PMCPMC3954416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.