ReviewDer Orthopade2013
[Prognosis scores for spinal metastases].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in early detection and therapy of spinal metastasis have improved life expectancy of patients with various tumor entities. However, this and the demographic development have led to an increased risk for developing spinal metastases. Numerous prognostic factors have been determined to allow an assessment of outcome and survival time of patients with metastatic spinal tumors. The implementation of these factors into different scoring systems has been encouraging in the decision making process of spinal surgery. This overview highlights some of the most important prognostic factors and scores which may facilitate surgical considerations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23887849What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.