Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23887821›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2014

The heart-break of social rejection versus the brain wave of social acceptance.

Frederik M van der Veen, Maurits W van der Molen, Priya P Sahibdin, Ingmar H A Franken

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The impact of social exclusion on anticipatory attentional processing.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Performance monitoring during a minimal group manipulation.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frederik M van der VeenDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, Institute of Psychology, Erasmus University, 3000DR Rotterdam, and Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, Institute of Psychology, Erasmus University, 3000DR Rotterdam, and Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands veen@fsw.eur.nl.
Maurits W van der MolenDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, Institute of Psychology, Erasmus University, 3000DR Rotterdam, and Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Priya P SahibdinDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, Institute of Psychology, Erasmus University, 3000DR Rotterdam, and Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ingmar H A FrankenDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, Institute of Psychology, Erasmus University, 3000DR Rotterdam, and Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of social rejection on cardiac and brain responses was examined in a study in which participants had to decide on the basis of pictures of virtual peers whether these peers would like them or not. Physiological and behavioral responses to expected and unexpected acceptance and rejection were compared. It was found that participants expected that about 50% of the virtual judges gave them a positive judgment. Cardiac deceleration was strongest for unexpected social rejection. In contrast, the brain response was strongest to expected acceptance and was characterized by a positive deflection peaking around 325 ms following stimulus onset and the observed difference was maximal at fronto-central positions. The cardiac and electro-cortical responses were not related. It is hypothesized that these differential response patterns might be related to earlier described differential involvement of the dorsal and ventral portion of the anterior cingulate cortex.

Indexed as

EmotionsPsychological DistanceRejection, PsychologyBrainBrain MappingElectrocardiographyElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHeart RateHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adultanterior cingulateERPHRP3social rejection

Identifiers

PMID23887821
PMCPMC4158370
OpenAlexW2151370328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.