Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23887585›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2013

Characterization of specific p63 and p63-N-terminal isoform antibodies and their application for immunohistochemistry.

Marta Nekulova, Jitka Holcakova, Rudolf Nenutil, Rembert Stratmann, Pavla Bouchalova, Petr Müller, Lucie Mouková, Philip J Coates, Borivoj Vojtesek

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The dual role of p63 in cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. p63 Is a Promising Marker in the Diagnosis of Unusual Skin Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. STAT3, stem cells, cancer stem cells and p63.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. ΔNp63 regulates cell proliferation, differentiation, adhesion, and migration in the BL2 subtype of basal-like breast cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta NekulovaRegional Centre for Applied Molecular Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic.
Jitka Holcakova
Rudolf Nenutil
Rembert Stratmann
Pavla Bouchalova
Petr Müller
Lucie Mouková
Philip J Coates
Borivoj Vojtesek
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute · CZUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The TP63 gene gives rise to protein isoforms with different properties and functions due to the presence (TAp63) or absence (ΔNp63) of an N-terminal p53-like transactivation domain. Immunohistochemistry for p63 has clinical value for certain tumour types, but investigations have been hampered by a lack of well characterized antibodies and the inability to discriminate between these N-terminal isoforms with opposite functional properties. We have extensively characterized a series of monoclonal antibodies to recombinant human TAp63 and two commercial p63 monoclonals by Western blot, immunostaining and phage display epitope mapping. Twenty-eight of 29 (96.6 %) novel monoclonals that recognized all p63 isoforms showed substantial cross-reactivity with p73, as did the commercial antibody, 4A4. One novel clone, PANp63-6.1, showed slight cross-reaction with p73 by Western blotting but not immunohistochemistry and the SFI-6 monoclonal did not cross-react with p73 or p53. Phage display revealed that the PANp63-6.1 epitope has one amino acid difference between p63 and p73, the 4A4 epitope is identical in both, whereas the SFI-6 epitope is unique to p63, accounting for these findings. We also produced and characterized a TAp63-specific clone that does not recognize p53 or p73, and we prepared polyclonal sera specific for ΔNp63 isoforms. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated that TAp63 is expressed in a variety of epithelial and other cell types during development, often in a converse pattern to ΔNp63, but has a very limited expression in normal adult tissues and is independent of ΔNp63. TAp63 was expressed in 17.6 % of squamous cancers of cervix that expressed p63, unlike normal cervix where TAp63 was not expressed. TAp63 did not associate with proliferative index, but cervical carcinomas with TAp63 expression showed improved survival. These data highlight the need for rigorous antibody characterization and indicate that p63-isoform identification may improve the clinical value of p63 expression analyses.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAdenocarcinomaAnimalsAntibody SpecificityBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Line, TumorCells, CulturedCross ReactionsDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryLung NeoplasmsMembrane ProteinsAntibodies, MonoclonalCKAP4 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsMembrane ProteinsNuclear ProteinsProtein IsoformsTP73 protein, humanTrp73 protein, mouseTumor Protein p73Tumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23887585
OpenAlexW2003820103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.