ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2013
Thomas Hodgkin: the "man" and "his disease": humani nihil a se alienum putabit (nothing human was foreign to him).
Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applicability of protocols from high-income countries in a resource limited setting; real world data of histopathology, clinical features and long-term outcome of Hodgkin Lymphoma in Sri Lanka.EClinicalMedicine · 2021Article
- Overview and outcome of Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Experience of a single developing country's oncology centre.PloS one · 2018Article
- The Legacy of Thomas Hodgkin Is Still Relevant 150 Years After His Death. Nothing of Humanity Was Foreign to Him.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thomas Hodgkin (1798-1865) was one of the leading physicians and scientists of the nineteenth century. A renowned diagnostician, he carried out pioneering work in public health, but devoted the greater part of his career to the study of pathology. His contributions transcend many fields, medical and non-medical, but his most important legacy to medical science was the recognition of the disease that bears his name. The diagnosis of Hodgkin's disease was difficult pending recognition of the "peculiar giant cells" that came to characterize the diagnosis. With identification of the Reed-Sternberg cell, it might have been expected that debate concerning the nature of Hodgkin's disease would be stilled. History proved to the contrary. A fierce controversy ignited with respect to the cellular origin of the Reed-Sternberg cell and the relationship, if any, of Hodgkin's disease to other malignant processes arising in the "absorbent glands and spleen." For a century, arguments ebbed and flowed, reflective of individual opinions and changing concepts, yielding ultimately to new methods for examining and identifying cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.