ArticleVaccine2013
Prevention of cholestasis in the murine rotavirus-induced biliary atresia model using passive immunization and nonreplicating virus-like particles.
Article in Vaccine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liver fibrosis in biliary atresia.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2019Review
- Recent advances in the pathogenesis and management of biliary atresia.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Biliary atresia (BA) is a neonatal cholangiopathy of unknown etiology that results in obliteration of bile ducts and is the primary indication for liver transplant in children. A murine model of BA, which involves infecting newborn mice with rhesus rotavirus (RRV) and leads to development of an obstructive cholangiopathy, has provided a model to assess measures to prevent and treat BA. We used this mouse model of RRV-induced BA to determine if passive immunization of pups using maternal immunization [injection of dams with non-replicating rotavirus (RV) virus-like particles (VLPs) or live RRV] or injection of pups with RV immune serum would protect these RRV-infected neonates from developing BA (measured using cholestasis). Parenteral immunization of mouse dams with two formulations of VLPs (containing viral proteins 2/6 or 2/6/7) resulted in a significant increase in serum RV antibody, and pups born to these immunized dams were protected from developing cholestasis following neonatal infection with RRV. Serum RV-specific antibody with titers of ≥400-800 in dams significantly protected pups from developing cholestasis, and a significant trend of increasing protection with high titers was observed (p<0.0001). Cholestatic pups had lower levels of RV serum antibody and higher serum (p<0.01) and liver (p<0.05) RV antigen compared to healthy pups. Passive transfer of low-titer (1600; p<0.05) or high-titer (25,600; p<0.01) RV immune serum to neonatal pups prior to RRV infection also protected them from developing cholestasis. Together, these findings indicate that passively acquired, neutralizing or non-neutralizing RV serum antibody attenuates viral replication and protects pups against disease in the RRV BA model. Early reduction of viral load by clearance with RV-specific antibody is likely a critical determinant of disease in this model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.